Anne R. Bass
Poverty does not increase the risk for total knee replacement failure or revision among black or white patients, and fails to explain observed racial disparities associated with the procedure, according to data published in Arthritis Care & Research.
“Blacks are at increased risk of total knee replacement (TKR) revision than whites, and blacks report significantly more pain and worse function 2 years after TKR,” Anne R. Bass, MD, of the Hospital for Special Surgery, and colleagues wrote. “We previously showed that racial disparities in patient reported outcomes are strongly influenced by community poverty and education. Whether disparities in TKR revision risk are related to poverty is unknown.”
To determine whether community poverty can explain racial disparities in patients who undergo total knee replacement, Bass and colleagues studied all black and white residents of New York state enrolled in the Hospital for Special Surgery knee replacement registry, and who received the procedure between Jan. 1, 2008, and Feb. 6, 2012.
Poverty does not increase the risk for total knee replacement failure among black or white patients, according to data.
The researchers included 4,062 patients who provided baseline questionnaire information, had a geo-codable address, were state residents, were either black or white and underwent unilateral total knee replacement in their study. Among the participants, 9% were black and 8% lived in census tracts where more than 20% lived below the poverty line.
These participants were linked to the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database, with information spanning from Jan. 1, 2008, to Dec. 31, 2014, to find revisions performed at other medical centers. In addition, the researchers linked participants to residential census tracts using geo-coded addresses.
Bass and colleagues used multivariate Cox regression to determine predictors of total knee replacement revision, with multivariate logistic regression used to analyze predictors of failure. Failure was defined as undergoing revision in New York state within 2 years following surgery, or demonstrating a “not improved” or “worsening” quality of life score 2 years after surgery.
According to the researchers, 3% of participants required revision a median of 454 days following surgery. The risk for revision was higher among black participants compared with whites (HR = 1.69; 95% CI, 1.01-2.81). However, after completing multivariable analysis, only younger age, male sex and constrained prosthesis were predictors of surgery revision. Failure occurred in 7% of patients who completed 2-year follow-up surveys. Risk factors for failure were nonosteoarthritis indications for total knee replacement, low surgeon volume and low expectations survey score.
Neither black race nor community poverty were predictors for failure. In addition, poverty was not associated with surgery revision.
“To our surprise, community poverty had no relationship to revision rates and, after controlling for other variables, race was not a factor either,” Bass told Healio Rheumatology. “Our explanation is that everyone in our study had surgery at HSS, a high-volume orthopedic hospital, since high hospital and surgeon volume is known to be associated with better TKR outcomes.” – by Jason Laday
Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.