The review of the available literature by Robert A. Magnussen, MD, on this topic is timely as orthopedic surgeons are increasingly interested in the correction of patella alta to control patella instability. Distalization of the tibial tuberosity brings the patella into the deeper part of the trochlear groove sooner in knee flexion, thereby affording improved stability and diminished likelihood of dislocation. When the trochlea is shallow, distalization makes sense.
As pointed out by Magnussen et al, the question remains as to when other procedures such as medial tubercle transfer or reconstruction of the medial capsular structures, including the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), might be warranted in addition to, or instead of, patella distalization. Many surgeons have achieved patella stability for years by assuring proper alignment/tracking of the patella in the trochlear groove and then restoring, by reconstruction, the medial support structures that support the patella as it slides along the trochlea with flexion and extension of the knee.
John P. Fulkerson
We must proceed cautiously with surgical planning. In his review, Dr. Magnussen has shown that 15% to 33% of patients still have patella apprehension after patella distalization, so I agree with him that we must look carefully for what other procedures, such as tibial tubercle medialization and MPFL reconstruction, are likely to improve the patient’s outcome. This should be the goal of every patellofemoral surgeon.
From my own experience, many patients have a distal pole patella articular lesion that will less likely become painful if the tip (or “nose”) of the patella is anteriorized selectively at the time of patella realignment. Anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer accomplishes this and, in the presence of patella alta, may be distalized to correct alta while optimizing patella alignment and unloading the distal patella. A corollary of this is that distalization alone is risky in patients with distal pole patella articular softening, as this vulnerable area might experience increased loads with distalization alone. Accurate and thoughtful decision making is imperative here.
Dr. Magnussen emphasizes the importance of using complementary procedures as needed to assure an optimal result in each patient. I agree. I have found that patella distalization is needed only in more extreme cases of patella alta and that restoration of balanced patella tracking while unloading patella articular lesions and reconstructing peripatellar support structure is the best and most reliable approach to recurrent patella instability in the majority of patients I see.
Magnussen RA. Treatment of patella alta in patients with episodic patellar dislocation: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Feb 8. [Epub ahead of print].
John P. Fulkerson, MD, is a clinical professor of orthopedic surgery at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine and practices at Orthopedic Associates of Hartford in Farmington, Conn. He is also president of The Patellofemoral Foundation.
Disclosure: Fulkerson receives royalties from DJO Global and is a patent holder for DJO Global.