Journal of Nursing Education

Major Article 

Military Students' Strengths and Challenges Based on Their Military Experiences: An Integrative Review

Catherine Wilson Cox, PhD, RN, CEN, CNE



Civilian nursing programs educate 100% of undergraduate military nursing students, yet many faculty are unaware of the challenges these students may encounter when they transition to the civilian classroom. The primary purpose of this integrative review was to ascertain the factors that challenge and/or facilitate a military student's transition to the civilian nursing classroom. A second purpose was to present recommendations so educators can become culturally competent to work with this unique student population.


Whittemore's and Knafl's five-step integrative review method (e.g., problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and presentation) was used to critically analyze and synthesize the literature regarding military students.


More than 70 articles were included in the final sample. They were framed by the interaction of the eight categories identified in Jeffreys' Nursing Universal Retention and Success model.


Recommendations are offered based on the review of the literature. [J Nurs Educ. 2019;58(7):392–400.]



Civilian nursing programs educate 100% of undergraduate military nursing students, yet many faculty are unaware of the challenges these students may encounter when they transition to the civilian classroom. The primary purpose of this integrative review was to ascertain the factors that challenge and/or facilitate a military student's transition to the civilian nursing classroom. A second purpose was to present recommendations so educators can become culturally competent to work with this unique student population.


Whittemore's and Knafl's five-step integrative review method (e.g., problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and presentation) was used to critically analyze and synthesize the literature regarding military students.


More than 70 articles were included in the final sample. They were framed by the interaction of the eight categories identified in Jeffreys' Nursing Universal Retention and Success model.


Recommendations are offered based on the review of the literature. [J Nurs Educ. 2019;58(7):392–400.]

As of 2016, only 7% of the population in the United States have served in the military (Bialik, 2017); coincidingly, the United States has seen an increased number of military students currently enrolled in a variety of institutions supported by federal funding (Ford & Vignare, 2015; Kato, Jinkerson, Holland, & Soper, 2016; Keita, Diaz, Miller, Olenick, & Simon, 2015; NASPA Research and Policy Institute, 2013). This may be attributed to an expansion of education benefits, as well as a military drawdown and recent initiatives to transition veterans into health care careers (Bureau of Health Workforce, 2014). Nonetheless, some military students struggle as they shift from the highly structured military environment to a self-directed civilian classroom (Blum, 2015; Ness, Rocke, Harrist, & Vroman, 2014). Because nursing schools also enroll military students, an integrative review was conducted to ascertain the factors that challenge and/or facilitate a military student's transition to the civilian nursing classroom.


Whittemore's and Knafl's (2005) five-step integrative review method (e.g., problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and presentation) was used to critically analyze and synthesize the literature regarding military students because it allowed for the incorporation of various methodologies.

Step One: Problem Identification

Civilian nursing programs educate 100% of undergraduate military nursing students, yet many faculty are unaware of the challenges these students may encounter when they transition to the civilian classroom. Hence, the primary purpose of this integrative review was to ascertain the factors that challenge and/or facilitate a military student's transition to the civilian nursing classroom. A second purpose was to present recommendations so educators can become culturally competent in order to work with this unique student population. Multiple transition theories were explored but Jeffreys' (2015) Nursing Universal Retention and Success (NURS) model was ultimately chosen to provide the conceptual framework for this integrative review because it was specific to nursing students and encompassed multiple factors that affect student success in undergraduate nursing programs.

Step Two: Literature Search

The literature search included articles published in English from 2005 to 2018, and the electronic databases explored were CINAHL®, Scopus®, ERIC, and Education Source. The search terms included Army, Soldier, Navy, Sailor, Marine Corps, Marine, Air Force, Airman, Enlisted, Enlistee, Military, Training, Corpsman, Corpsmen, Medic, Aerospace Medical Service Specialist, Nurse Corps Medical Enlisted Commissioning Program (MECP), Airman Scholarship & Commissioning Program (ASCP), Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Enlisted Commissioning Program (AECP), Enlisted Commissioning Programs, veteran OR veterans, BSN OR VBSN OR bachelor OR bachelors OR baccalaureate OR postsecondary OR post-secondary, student OR students, nursing OR nurse OR nurses, and campus OR college OR university, attrition, and transition OR transitions OR transitioning. More than 70 articles were included in the final sample, but only 12 of the publications were found in nursing journals or discussed military nursing students (Allen, Armstrong, Saladiner, Hamilton, & Conard, 2014; Allen, Billings, Green, Lujan, & Armstrong, 2012; Cox, 2019; D'Aoust, Rossiter, Itle, & Clochesy, 2016; Donelan et al., 2016; Dyar, 2016; Eddy & Hill, 2005; Hurlbut & Revuelto, 2018; Keita et al., 2015; Morrison-Beedy & Rossiter, 2018; Voelpel, Escallier, Fullerton, & Rodriguez, 2018; Wilkerson, 2015). Additionally, five articles discussed the care of Veterans by nursing students (Carlson, 2016; Kaplan, Murihead, & Zhang, 2017; McMillan et al., 2017; Moss, Moore, & Selleck, 2015; Rossiter, Morrison-Beedy, Capper, & D'Aoust, 2018) and the National League for Nursing (n.d.) has unfolding case studies and teaching strategies for working with Veterans and their families. However, the focus of this integrative review was on military nursing students, not military/Veteran patients. Finally, for the purposes of this article, the terms military student or military nursing student are used, and they encompass four categories (Table 1).

Terms for Military Students

Table 1:

Terms for Military Students

Step Three: Data Evaluation

The final sample included all scholarly literature pulled for this integrative review because each provided context for the subject matter. The sample incorporated opinion pieces, review articles, original research, association perspectives, and books.

Step Four: Data Analysis

Whittemore's and Knafl's (2005) four phases of data analysis were applied. The first phase, data reduction, included developing an overall classification system based on Jeffreys' (2015) NURS model. Data display was the second phase and allowed for the visualization of patterns and relationships via a data matrix. The third phase was data comparison, and it incorporated the use of the data matrix, making it helpful to begin to categorize the data in accordance with the NURS model. The final phase was conclusion drawing and verification; this entailed synthesizing important elements to interpret the data.

Step Five: Presentation

The last step of Whittemore's and Knafl's (2005) integrative review method demanded that conclusions were supported by the evidence. From this step, implications for education, research, and/or practice are shared. In addition, Table 2 provides a list of general resources for educators working with military student nurses, and Table 3 offers recommendations that were derived from the nursing literature.

Teaching Military Student Nurses: General Resources for Educators

Table 2:

Teaching Military Student Nurses: General Resources for Educators

Recommendations Based on the Experience of Nursing Programs

Table 3:

Recommendations Based on the Experience of Nursing Programs


Student Profile Characteristics

According to Jeffreys (2015), this category is defined by student demographics, including prior work experience. Hence, the literature supported the concept that military students are valuable assets—because they convey a level of maturity and strong work ethic and are disciplined, bring important life experiences to the classroom, or are team builders—but that they have needs that differ from nonmilitary students (American Council on Education, 2016; Gregg, Howell, & Shordike, 2016; Gregg, Kitzman, & Shordike, 2016; Hart & Thompson, 2016; Hitt et al., 2015; Lighthall, 2012; McBain, Kim, Cook, & Snead, 2012; Ness et al., 2014). For example, many are older, have families, or tend to live off campus and therefore have to commute to school (American Council on Education, 2018). Coll and Weiss (2015) shared 10 strengths that military students bring to the classroom: leadership, team membership and team leadership, diversity, punctuality, flexibility and adaptability, an ability to be self-directed, a possession of outstanding work habits, a commitment to excellence, a global outlook, and an investment in their communities. However, Lighthall (2012) cautioned educators that some military students may not ask for help or will ask questions only as a last resort. Ness et al. (2014) confirmed that military students struggle with developing a self-identity outside of their respective services and that it may be taxing for them to forge a relationship with academic peers or faculty. Finally, Roost and Roost (2014) stated that military students vary in their experiences because a service member who has never deployed will have events that differ from one who has deployed and even those who have deployed may or may not have been exposed to combat.

Voelpel et al. (2018) developed survey instruments to gauge the perceptions of nursing military students regarding the value of support strategies put into place to facilitate their academic success. Another one of their surveys targeted faculty and staff regarding academic and student success. Replicating the surveys with other schools of nursing may be an option for nursing research. Additionally, Dyar (2016) identified the following gaps in the literature regarding nursing research and this student population: nursing students who have deployed to combat zones, as well as the transition of military nursing students to the classroom. Hence, both qualitative and quantitative studies regarding these areas are needed.

Student Affective Factors

According to Jeffreys (2015), this category incorporates cultural congruence whereby students sync their attitudes, values, and beliefs with both the academic environment and the nursing profession. However, nursing faculties vary in their experience regarding how best to acclimatize military nursing students to the classroom. Hence, many would benefit from formalized training focusing on areas related to military culture, common language used, deployments, rank structure, and even negating stereotypes that disproportionately concentrate on a propensity for violence so faculty can become culturally competent to work with military students (Allen et al., 2014; Barnard-Brak, Bagby, Jones, & Sulak, 2011; Bonar & Domenici, 2011; Cass, 2014; Cass & Hammond, 2015; D'Aoust et al., 2016; Elliott, 2015; Elliott, Gonzalez, & Larsen, 2011; Graf, Ysasi, & Marini, 2014; McBain et al., 2012; Osborne, 2014; Wilson, Smith, Lee, & Stevenson, 2013; Voelpel et al., 2018). Furthermore, D'Aoust et al. (2016) reported that their military students felt that faculty did not understand their specific needs, so at the authors' institution a 3-hour university-wide faculty and staff program was developed, taught by student Veterans, and included these topics: Who Is a Veteran, Transition and Reintegration Challenges, Academic Issues, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Misperceptions, and How to Become an Ally. Attendees then received a sticker they could place on their office doors so that military students could easily identify those who had the training and were most likely to be receptive to their concerns. Taking it one step further, the nursing program then developed a series of online “Got Your Six” training modules for faculty, staff, and clinical partners. Burnett and Segoria (2009) also endorsed faculty online workshops.

Barnard-Brak et al. (2011) and Dyar (2016) wrote that faculty members who have negative feelings about the military may express this, thus alienating military students. Hence, teacher efficacy training programs could raise self-awareness. Furthermore, ideal faculty include those with prior military service because they can role model for the students by providing guidance about transitioning from the service to academia, as well as act as interpreters for faculty regarding military matters (Allen et al., 2012; Wick, Bester, Garcia, & Stoll, 2014). No matter what—if any—accommodations are made for military students, faculty should always maintain high expectations so that students are successful with meeting course goals and objectives, as well as program standards (López, Springer, & Nelson, 2015; Sportsman & Thomas, 2015).

Even thinking outside the box can add to student success. For example, Eddy and Hill (2005) wrote about Hill's deployment to Iraq with her South Dakota Guard Unit and how her nursing faculty worked together to provide didactic content, as well as count clinical hours toward graduation requirements while Hill was still deployed. Allen et al. (2014) offered solutions that focused on progression, retention, and graduation of military students from nursing programs. One of their solutions was to offer innovative education models that reduced redundancy for areas whereby competency has already been validated via the military.

Furthermore, the literature revealed some additional thoughts for faculty to consider when they have military students in their classrooms. First, military students may feel isolated from their peers and may think that faculty do not understand them (Grossbard et al., 2014). Hence, faculty should provide an inclusive atmosphere for all students. Additionally, the majority of military students are assets to the classroom, given their experience with leadership and team building (Hart & Thompson, 2016; Sportsman & Thomas, 2015). Many are global citizens, so faculty are advised to take advantage of a military student's experience. However, military students may not want to discuss their military experience nor reveal that they even have a military background; hence, faculty should provide a classroom environment that is safe by respecting a student's privacy and leaving it up to the student to disclose any prior service (Kirchner, 2015). Furthermore, Dyar (2016) shared six barriers that military students experience and which faculty should remember: stigma (which leads to asking inappropriate questions), peer classmates (without a military background), traditional nursing education (that uses customary pedagogies), personal and financial responsibilities (which result in struggles), and gender (whereby men may have represented the majority in the military but remain the minority in nursing).

Academic Factors

According to Jeffreys (2015), this category includes study skills, class attendance, time management, and/or institutional resources. A reoccurring theme in the literature was that military culture emphasizes structure, discipline, and order; this is very different from a typical college student's life (Kirchner, 2015; Naphan & Elliot, 2015; SFVAMC's Veterans Outreach Program at City College of San Francisco, 2013). Further, because they are accustomed to a very organized environment, military students do not respond well to inconsistent or capricious policies (Hitt et al., 2015). Military students also benefit when colleges and universities are prepared to administer to their needs (e.g., centralizing services by offering “one-stop shopping” is one way to accomplish this), provide a welcoming and friendly campus (e.g., “Veteran-friendly”), offer services for previous injuries and disabilities, connect military students with their military peers, and possess great communication plans (Burnett & Segoria, 2009; Cass, 2014; Cass & Hammond, 2015; Church, 2009; Hitt et al., 2015; McBain et al., 2012; NASPA Research and Policy Institute, 2013; O'Herrin, 2011; Osborne, 2014; Romero, Riggs, & Ruggero, 2015; Schiavone & Gentry, 2014; SFVAMC's Veterans Outreach Program at City College of San Francisco, 2013).

Environmental Factors

According to Jeffreys (2015), this category reflects financial status, family support, childcare concerns, transportation issues, and living arrangements. Financial concerns, including payment delays by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and not graduating on time are the two biggest factors that military students fear (Ackerman, DiRamio, & Garza Mitchell, 2009; McBain et al., 2012). Elliott (2015) drove home the financial concerns of military students by saying that financial hardship predicted increased symptoms of depression and PTSD. Consequently, schools should make military students cognizant of financial aid options that complement their VA benefits. Norman et al. (2015) and Olsen, Badger, and McCuddy (2014) also spoke of financial barriers, and Snyder, Wick, Skillman, and Frogner (2016) found that navigating complex benefits was a barrier to military students.

Academic Outcomes

According to Jeffreys (2015), this category involves anything regarding grades. Bryan, Bryan, Hinkson, Bichrest, and Ahern (2014) wrote that depression may play a stronger role than PTSD when it comes to a low grade point average (GPA) for military students and that the warning signs for academic problems include turning in late assignments, receiving lower test grades than expected but still passing, failing a test, and skipping or choosing not to attend class. Voelpel et al. (2018) shared that test-taking abilities could still be affected despite a variety of tutoring and advisement resources provided to their military students. Durdella and Kim (2012) found that college GPA was negatively associated with students who had prior military service. Because Grossbard et al. (2014) found that lower perceived social support military students receive from the both the faculty and staff negatively correlated with their GPAs, it is imperative for nursing programs to be demonstrative in their support of these students.

Psychological Outcomes

According to Jeffreys (2015), this category denotes psychological outcomes related to stress and satisfaction. Church (2009) reported that the three signature injuries from the Global War on Terrorism were physical injuries, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and mental health issues. Consequently, the literature is replete regarding psychological concerns for military service members/Veterans. Smith (2012) addressed the specific psychological barriers of female Veteran students as well. Regarding self-harm, Blosnich, Kopacz, McCarten, and Bossarte (2015) found that military students had higher odds of self-harm than their civilian peers. However, Bryan and Bryan (2015) reported no difference between traditional versus military students, although Native American military students may be in a high-risk subgroup for suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Rudd, Goulding, and Bryan (2011) also addressed mental health issues and self-harm via the results of a national survey that explored psychological symptoms and suicide risk.

Because military personnel are frequently deploying in arduous conditions for long periods of time and may have been exposed to trauma, they are at risk for PTSD, behavioral health issues, and TBI (Barnard-Brak et al., 2011; Bonar & Domenici, 2011; Campbell & Riggs, 2015; Elliott, 2015; Elliott et al., 2011; Ellison et al., 2012; Kato et al., 2016; López et al., 2015; Ness, Middleton, & Hildebrandt, 2015; Ness et al., 2014; Ness & Vroman, 2014; Schonfeld et al., 2015; Smith, Vilhauer, & Chafos, 2017; Smith-Osborne, 2012; Widome, Kehle, et al., 2011; Widome, Laska, Gulden, Fu, & Lust, 2011). Concerning alcohol abuse, the drinking behaviors of all college students is a public health concern, and because the military has a history of drinking rituals it is postulated that alcoholism could also affect a military student's success in higher education (Barry, Whiteman, Wadsworth, & Hitt, 2012; Grossbard et al., 2014; Widome, Laska, et al., 2011).

Whitley, Tschudi, and Gieber (2013) revealed the results of a symposia whereby college administrators, military students, and advocates for Veterans recognized the need to be equipped to handle possible behavioral and physical health needs. They offered 12 recommendations for supporting the health needs of military students as follows (Whitley et al., 2013, pp. 3–4):

  • Develop a plan to destigmatize support services so military students will access them.
  • Provide a welcoming environment and “warm hand-offs” to resources (e.g., the registrar, academic advisors).
  • Hire learning specialists to teach the skills necessary to promote academic success.
  • Provide adequate accommodations for Veterans with PTSD and/or attention deficit disorders (e.g., offer a quiet testing environment).
  • Hire experienced and trained counselors who are themselves veterans.
  • Provide peer mentors.
  • Establish support groups to help multiple military students at the same time.
  • Invest in hiring and/or training support group leaders to have professional facilitators who know how to put participants at ease.
  • Provide a drop-in center with trained peer counselors.
  • Have multiple entry points to group resources, including both formal and informal groups.
  • Establish a central information resource to collect all information about military students, as well as coordinate events.
  • Develop and implement a comprehensive student Veteran orientation, including a handbook with a list resources.

Outside Surrounding Factors

According to Jeffreys (2015), this category pertains to events outside of the academic environment including regional, national, and international events. When military students deploy during an academic year, McBain et al. (2012) advocated that institutions have policies in place to refund tuition, allow students to complete a course upon return to the classroom, and, above all, be flexible in order to minimize any administrative obstacles faced by military students returning from a deployment. This is especially important because there are federal laws that protect military students who miss classes because of military orders (U.S. Department of Education, 2017). Also, providing non-traditional options for deployed military students to complete course work while meeting the course goals and objectives reveals the faculty's recognition that these students are constantly balancing dual obligations that their nonmilitary peers do not have: service to their country, as well as earning their nursing degree (Hitt et al., 2015). It may also indirectly improve their performance and lead to their retention in the nursing program (Wilson et al., 2013).

Professional Integration Factors

According to Jeffreys (2015), this final category is comprised of any factors that allow nursing students to interact with their peers, faculty, and nursing professionals. It can be a stressful life transition to academia, so one protective factor for any debilitating effects is social support, as well as encouragement from one's own military unit (Campbell & Riggs, 2015; Elliott, 2015; Ellison et al., 2012; Kato et al., 2016; Wilson et al., 2013). Additionally, because military culture is steeped in traditions including friendly rivalries (e.g., “Go Navy, Beat Army”) and peer support, these students feel more comfortable with each other and prefer to engage in collaborative work with their fellow military peers (Burnett & Segoria, 2009). O'Herrin (2011) conveyed that military students may even benefit from a designated space (e.g., a Veteran lounge) so that they have the opportunity to connect with their military peers when feeling overwhelmed but also noted that social isolation from the academic community is not the goal of military-specific endeavors. Finally, Coll and Weiss (2015) emphasized the importance of strong faculty advisement to support military students in higher education.


This integrative literature review elucidates that military students have unique needs when they enter the civilian nursing classroom but that their distinctive experiences can also contribute to the classroom experience. Recommendations have already been shared and the implications for nursing education, research, and practice are discussed further.

Implications for Nursing Education

Military students are such great assets to nursing programs because they are global citizens, bring a variety of experiences to the classroom, and are used to teamwork. But they do present with some challenges, primarily because some struggle with the transition from such a highly structured, dictation-oriented military environment to an academic environment that is not as prescriptive. Although today's nursing student is not always the 18-year-old individual coming directly from high school, living in a dormitory, and not working, military nursing students most likely either were not ready to attend college or could not afford it upon graduation from high school but have since come to the realization that they want to become a nurse. However, they have had a break in service since the last time they were in school and acquiring new knowledge—that is not built on memorization, but rather requires critical thinking skills and application—requires facilitation spearheaded by a team that values their commitment to both their nation and to the nursing profession. And because they are no longer with the team that they trained with, went to war with, and tragically lost members of, it may be hard for them to acclimate to a new team of civilian peers who have not experienced such intense circumstances. A nursing faculty that becomes familiar with the uniqueness of this student population and proactively recognizes when they are challenged is a faculty who will best serve other students who may need to tap into resources before it is too late to academically succeed.

Implications for Nursing Research

Although some national studies of military students have transpired, none have been published regarding military nursing students. Perhaps one, if not all, of the 31 nursing schools that received federal funding via the “Nurse Education, Practice, Quality and Retention Program: Veteran's Bachelor of Science Degree in Nursing” (to support the transition of veterans to a career in nursing) will capitalize on this gap in nursing knowledge and share their scientific results.

Implications for Nursing Practice

Military nursing students perform their clinical rotations via arrangements with clinical partners and perhaps may even work for them someday. Hence, clinical partners may benefit from a version of online “Got Your Six” training as well. Additionally, military nursing students working with patients who are Veterans, whether at a VA clinical site or a civilian institution, have the potential to immediately establish a rapport with these patients because they “speak the same language.”


Civilian baccalaureate nursing programs educate 100% of undergraduate military nursing students, yet many faculty are unaware of the challenges and facilitators that Airmen, Soldiers, Sailors, and Marines—whether they are on Active Duty, in the Reserves, in the Guard, retired, or Veterans—encounter when they attend a nursing program. Consequently, nursing faculties vary in their experience as to how best to acclimatize military nursing students to the classroom. Given the dearth of knowledge regarding military students in nursing programs, it is hoped that the findings from this integrative review of both nursing and nonnursing sources advances what is currently known about the experience of military students in the classroom, as well as what nursing faculty can do to assist their learning, make them successful in the classroom, and retain them in their programs. It may also serve as a catalyst to institutions and nursing programs to minimize transitional challenges and increase student experience and success across all student populations.


  • Ackerman, R., DiRamio, D. & Garza Mitchell, R.L. (2009). Transitions: Combat veterans as college students. New Directions for Student Services, 2009(126), 5–14. doi:10.1002/ss.311 [CrossRef]
  • Allen, P., Billings, L., Green, A., Lujan, J. & Armstrong, M.L. (2012). Returning enlisted veterans-upward (to) professional nursing: Not all innovative ideas succeed. Journal of Professional Nursing, 28, 241–246. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.03.002 [CrossRef]
  • Allen, P.E., Armstrong, M.L., Saladiner, J.E., Hamilton, M.J. & Conard, P.L. (2014). Opportunities, hurdles, solutions, and approaches to transition military veterans into professional nursing programs. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30, 474–480. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2014.03.007 [CrossRef]
  • American Council on Education. (2018). Toolkit for veteran friendly institutions. Retrieved from
  • Barnard-Brak, L., Bagby, J.H., Jones, N. & Sulak, T. (2011). Teaching post 9/11 student-veterans with symptoms of PTSD: The influence of faculty perceptions and self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 35, 29–36.
  • Barry, A.E., Whiteman, S., Wadsworth, S.M. & Hitt, S. (2012). The alcohol use and associated mental health problems of student service members/veterans in higher education. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 19, 415–425.
  • Bialik, K. (2017). The changing face of America's veteran population. Retrieved from
  • Blosnich, J.R., Kopacz, M.S., McCarten, J. & Bossarte, R.M. (2015). Mental health and self-directed violence among student service members/veterans in postsecondary education. Journal of American College Health, 63, 418–426. doi:10.1080/07448481.2014.931282 [CrossRef]
  • Blum, R. (2015). The hard path from Afghanistan to the classroom. Retrieved from
  • Bonar, T.C. & Domenici, P.L. (2011). Counseling and connecting with the military undergraduate: The intersection of military service and university life. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 25, 204–219. doi:10.1080/87568225.2011.581925 [CrossRef]
  • Bryan, C.J. & Bryan, A.O. (2015). Sociodemographic correlates of suicidal thoughts and behaviors among college student service members/veterans. Journal of American College Health, 63, 502–507. doi:10.1080/07448481.2014.939982 [CrossRef]
  • Bryan, C.J., Bryan, A.O., Hinkson, K., Bichrest, M. & Ahern, D.A. (2014). Depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and grade point average among student servicemembers and veterans. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 51, 1035–1046. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0012 [CrossRef]
  • Bureau of Health Workforce. (2014). Nurse education, practice, quality and retention (NEPQR) program—Veteran's Bachelor of Science degree in nursing. Retrieved from
  • Burnett, S.E. & Segoria, J. (2009). Collaboration for military transition students from combat to college: It takes a community. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 22, 53–58.
  • Campbell, R. & Riggs, S.A. (2015). The role of psychological symptomatology and social support in the academic adjustment of previously deployed student veterans. Journal of American College Health, 63, 473–481. doi:10.1080/07448481.2015.1040408 [CrossRef]
  • Carlson, J. (2016). Baccalaureate nursing faculty competencies and teaching strategies to enhance the care of the veteran population: Perspectives of Veteran Affairs Nursing Academy (VANA) faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32, 314–323. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.006 [CrossRef]
  • Cass, D. (2014). The strategic student veteran: Successfully transitioning from the military to college academics. Boulder, CO: Uvize.
  • Cass, D. & Hammond, S. (2015). Bridging the gap: Technology and veteran academic success. Online Learning, 19, 83–91.
  • Church, T.E. (2009). Returning veterans on campus with war related injuries and the long road back home. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 22, 43–52.
  • Coll, J.E. & Weiss, E.L. (Eds.). (2015). Supporting veterans in higher education: A primer for administrators, faculty, and advisors. Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.
  • Cox, C.W. (2019). Remembering the sacrifices of veterans and their loved ones. Nursing, 49(5), 49–50. doi:10.1097/01.NURSE.0000554626.07132.f8 [CrossRef]
  • D'Aoust, R.F., Rossiter, A.G., Itle, E. & Clochesy, J.M. (2016). Got your six: Supporting veterans' move into professional nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives, 37, 340–342. doi:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000081 [CrossRef]
  • Donelan, K., Romano, C., Buerhaus, P., DesRoches, C., Applebaum, S., Ward, J.R. & Hinshaw, A.S. (2016). National surveys of military personnel, nursing students, and the public: Drivers of military nursing careers. Military Medicine, 181, 1391. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00295 [CrossRef]
  • Durdella, N.R. & Kim, Y.K. (2012). Understanding patterns of college outcomes among student veterans. Journal of Studies in Education, 2, 109–129. doi:10.5296/jse.v2i2.1469 [CrossRef]
  • Dyar, K.L. (2016). Veterans in transition: Implications for nurse educators. Nursing Forum, 51, 173–179. doi:10.1111/nuf.12135 [CrossRef]
  • Eddy, C. & Hill, K. (2005). Nursing clinical in Iraq. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 18, 49–52. doi:10.1177/1084822305279887 [CrossRef]
  • Elliott, M. (2015). Predicting problems on campus: An analysis of college student veterans. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15, 105–126. doi:10.1111/asap.12066 [CrossRef]
  • Elliott, M., Gonzalez, C. & Larsen, B. (2011). U.S. military veterans transition to college: Combat, PTSD, and alienation on campus. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 48, 279–296. doi:10.2202/1949-6605.6293 [CrossRef]
  • Ellison, M. L., Mueller, L., Smelson, D., Corrigan, P.W., Stone, R.A.T., Bokhour, B.G. & Drebing, C. (2012). Supporting the education goals of post-9/11 veterans with self-reported PTSD symptoms: A needs assessment. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 35, 209–217. doi:10.2975/35.3.2012.209.217 [CrossRef]
  • Ford, K. & Vignare, K. (2015). The evolving military learner population: A review of the literature. Online Learning, 19, 7–30.
  • Graf, N.M., Ysasi, N.A. & Marini, I. (2014). Assessment of military viewpoints regarding post-secondary education: Classroom preferences and experiences. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 59, 18–29. doi:10.1177/0034355214558937 [CrossRef]
  • Gregg, B.T., Howell, D.M. & Shordike, A. (2016). Experiences of veterans transitioning to postsecondary education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(6), 7006250010p1–7006250010p8. doi:10.5014/ajot.2016.021030 [CrossRef]
  • Gregg, B.T., Kitzman, P.H. & Shordike, A. (2016). Well-being and coping of student veterans readjusting into academia: A pilot survey. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 32, 86–107. doi:10.1080/0164212X.2015.1082081 [CrossRef]
  • Grossbard, J.R., Widome, R., Lust, K., Simpson, T.L., Lostutter, T.W. & Saxon, A. (2014). High-risk drinking and academic performance among college student veterans. Journal of Alcohol & Drug Education, 58(3), 28–47.
  • Hart, D.A. & Thompson, R. (2016). Veterans in the writing classroom: Three programmatic approaches to facilitate the transition from the military to higher education. College Composition and Communication68, 345–371.
  • Hitt, S., Sternberg, M., Wadsworth, S.M., Vaughan, J., Carlson, R., Dansie, E. & Mohrbacher, M. (2015). The higher education landscape for US student service members and veterans in Indiana. Higher Education, 70, 535–550. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9854-6 [CrossRef]
  • Hurlbut, J. & Revuelto, I. (2018). Transitioning veterans into a BSN pathway: Building the program from the ground up to promote diversity and inclusion. Medsurg Nursing, 27, 266–269.
  • Jeffreys, M.R. (2015). Jeffreys's nursing universal retention and success model: Overview and action ideas for optimizing outcomes A–Z. Nurse Education Today, 35, 425–431. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.004 [CrossRef]
  • Kaplan, B., Murihead, L. & Zhang, W. (2017). Leveraging partnerships: Nursing student veteran-centered simulation in situ. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13, 258–263. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2017.02.001 [CrossRef]
  • Kato, L., Jinkerson, J.D., Holland, S.C. & Soper, H.V. (2016). From combat zones to the classroom: Transitional adjustment in OEF/OIF student veterans. Qualitative Report, 21, 2131–2147.
  • Keita, M.D., Diaz, V.J., Miller, A.P., Olenick, M. & Simon, S.R. (2015). Transitioning from military medics to registered nurses. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 8, 495–502. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S93254 [CrossRef]
  • Kirchner, M.J. (2015). Supporting student veteran transition to college and academic success. Adult Learning, 26, 116–123. doi:10.1177/1045159515583813 [CrossRef]
  • Lighthall, A. (2012). Ten things you should know about today's student veteran. Thought & Action, 28, 81–90.
  • López, O.S., Springer, S.B. & Nelson, J.B. (2015). Veterans in the college classroom: Guidelines for instructional practices. Adult Learning, 27, 143–151. doi:10.1177/1045159515601825 [CrossRef]
  • McBain, L., Kim, Y.M., Cook, B.J. & Snead, K.M. (2012). From soldier to student II: Assessing campus programs for veterans and service members. Retrieved from
  • McMillan, L.R., Crumbley, D., Freeman, J., Rhodes, M., Kane, M. & Napper, J. (2017). Caring for the veteran, military and family member nursing competencies: Strategies for integrating content into nursing school curricula. Journal of Professional Nursing, 33, 378–386. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.06.002 [CrossRef]
  • Morrison-Beedy, D. & Rossiter, A.G. (2018). Next set of orders: Best practices for academia to ensure student success and military/veteran focus. Nurse Education Today, 66, 175–178. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.041 [CrossRef]
  • Moss, J.A., Moore, R.L. & Selleck, C.S. (2015). Veteran competencies for undergraduate nursing education. Advances in Nursing Science, 38, 306–316. doi:10.1097/ANS.0000000000000092 [CrossRef]
  • Naphan, D. & Elliot, M. (2015). Role exit from the military: Student veterans' perceptions of transitioning from the U.S. military to higher education. Qualitative Report, 20(2), 36–48.
  • NASPA Research and Policy Institute. (2013). Measuring the success of student veterans and active duty military students. Retrieved from
  • National League for Nursing. (n.d.). Advancing care excellence for veterans. Retrieved from
  • Ness, B.M., Middleton, M.J. & Hildebrandt, M.J. (2015). Examining the effects of self-reported posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and positive relations with others on self-regulated learning for student service members/veterans. Journal of American College Health, 63, 448–458. doi:10.1080/07448481.2014.975719 [CrossRef]
  • Ness, B.M., Rocke, M.R., Harrist, C.J. & Vroman, K.G. (2014). College and combat trauma: An insider's perspective of the post-secondary education experience shared by service members managing neurobehavioral symptoms. NeuroRehabilitation, 35, 147–158.
  • Ness, B.M. & Vroman, K. (2014). Preliminary examination of the impact of traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder on self-regulated learning and academic achievement among military service members enrolled in postsecondary education. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29, 33–43. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182a1cd4e [CrossRef]
  • Norman, S.B., Rosen, J., Himmerich, S., Myers, U.S., Davis, B., Browne, K.C. & Piland, N. (2015). Student veteran perceptions of facilitators and barriers to achieving academic goals. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 52, 701–712. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2015.01.0013 [CrossRef]
  • O'Herrin, E. (2011). Enhancing veteran success in higher education. Peer Review, 13, 15–18.
  • Olsen, T., Badger, K. & McCuddy, M.D. (2014). Understanding the student veterans' college experience: An exploratory study. U.S. Army Medical Department Journal, 101–108.
  • Osborne, N.J. (2014). Veteran ally: Practical strategies for closing the military-civilian gap on campus. Innovative Higher Education, 39, 247–260. doi:10.1007/s10755-013-9274-z [CrossRef]
  • Romero, D.H., Riggs, S.A. & Ruggero, C. (2015). Coping, family social support, and psychological symptoms among student veterans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 242–252. doi:10.1037/cou0000061 [CrossRef]
  • Roost, A. & Roost, N. (2014). Supporting veterans in the classroom. Academe, 100(3), 31–34.
  • Rossiter, A.G., Morrison-Beedy, D., Capper, T. & D'Aoust, R.F. (2018). Meeting the needs of the 21st century veteran: Development of an evidence-based online veteran healthcare course. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34, 280–283. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.10.007 [CrossRef]
  • Rudd, M.D., Goulding, J. & Bryan, C.J. (2011). Student veterans: A national survey exploring psychological symptoms and suicide risk. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42, 354–360. doi:10.1037/a0025164 [CrossRef]
  • Schiavone, V. & Gentry, D. (2014). Veteran-students in transition at a midwestern university. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 62, 29–38. doi:10.1080/07377363.2014.872007 [CrossRef]
  • Schonfeld, L., Braue, L.A., Stire, S., Gum, A.M., Cross, B.L. & Brown, L.M. (2015). Behavioral health and adjustment to college life for student service members/veterans. Journal of American College Health, 63, 428–436. doi:10.1080/07448481.2014.963106 [CrossRef]
  • SFVAMC's Veterans Outreach Program at City College of San Francisco. (2013). 2013 APA silver award: On-campus VA mental health and social work services for student veterans. Psychiatric Services, 64(10), e10–e11. doi:10.1176/ [CrossRef]
  • Smith, J.G., Vilhauer, R.P. & Chafos, V. (2017). Do military veteran and civilian students function differently in college?Journal of American College Health, 65, 76–79. doi:10.1080/07448481.2016.1245193 [CrossRef]
  • Smith, N.L. (2012). Complexities of culture: Understanding the identity of female veterans transitioning from military to college (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
  • Smith-Osborne, A. (2012). Supported education for returning veterans with PTSD and other mental disorders. Journal of Rehabilitation, 78(2), 4–12.
  • Snyder, C.R., Wick, K.H., Skillman, S.M. & Frogner, B.K. (2016). Pathways for military veterans to enter healthcare careers. Seattle: Center for Health Workforce Studies, University of Washington.
  • Sportsman, M.A. & Thomas, L. (2015). Coming home to school: Challenges and strategies for effective teaching with military veterans. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10, 43–55.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Frequently asked questions: Institutional readmission requirements for servicemembers. Retrieved from
  • Voelpel, P., Escallier, L., Fullerton, J. & Rodriguez, I. (2018). Transitioning veterans to nursing careers: A model program. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34, 273–279. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.11.010 [CrossRef]
  • Whitley, K, Tschudi, P.F. & Gieber, C.T. (2013). Life beyond war: Supporting the mental health needs of student veterans. Retrieved from
  • Whittemore, R. & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52, 546–553. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x [CrossRef]
  • Wick, K.H., Bester, V., Garcia, D.A. & Stoll, H. (2014). Full circle: A new classroom site to facilitate the veteran to physician assistant pathway. Military Medicine, 179, 1444–1448. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00117 [CrossRef]
  • Widome, R., Kehle, S.M., Carlson, K.F., Laska, M.N., Gulden, A. & Lust, K. (2011). Post-traumatic stress disorder and health risk behaviors among Afghanistan and Iraq War veterans attending college. American Journal of Health Behavior, 35, 387–392. doi:10.5993/AJHB.35.4.1 [CrossRef]
  • Widome, R., Laska, M.N., Gulden, A., Fu, S. & Lust, K. (2011). Health risk behaviors of Afghanistan and Iraq war veterans attending college. American Journal of Health Promotion, 26, 101–108. doi:10.4278/ajhp.090826-QUAN-278 [CrossRef]
  • Wilkerson, K. (2015). Reflections from an ROTC nursing student. Nursing, 45(10), 64–65.
  • Wilson, K.B., Smith, N.L., Lee, A.L. & Stevenson, M.A. (2013). When the Army post is the campus: Understanding the social and academic integration of soldiers attending college. Journal of College Student Development, 54, 628–642. doi:10.1353/csd.2013.0087 [CrossRef]

Terms for Military Students

Active DutyStudents work for the military full time and many are on scholarship programs via the Army's Medical Department Enlisted Commissioning Program; the Air Force's Nurse Enlisted Commissioning Program; or the Navy's Medical Enlisted Commissioning Program.
National GuardStudents work for the military part time via Army or Air Force units located at the state level.
ReservistStudents work part time for the military in either the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps; Reserve Officer Training Corps students are also categorized as reservists.
VeteranStudents are prior service members who are no longer on Active Duty nor in the Guard or Reserves; some institutions use this term for any student who has a military affiliation.

Teaching Military Student Nurses: General Resources for Educators

OrganizationResource TitleWebsite
American Association of Colleges of NursingEnhancing Veterans' Care Tool Kit—Education Resources
American Association of Community CollegesTop Ten Things Student Veterans Would like Faculty to Know
American Council on EducationToolkit for Veteran Friendly Institutions
American Council on EducationTranscripts for Military Personnel
Bureau of Health WorkforceHelping Veterans Transition to Civilian Health Care Careers
Council for Adult and Experiential LearningBest Practices for Serving the Student Veteran
Department of EducationReadmission of Servicemembers to Postsecondary Institutions AND
Department of EducationInformation for Military Families and Veterans
National Association of Student Personnel AdministratorsVeterans Knowledge Community: Resources
National Public RadioU.S. Military Lingo: The (Almost) Definitive Guide
U.S. Air ForceAir Force Nursing
U.S. ArmyArmy Nursing
U.S. NavyNavy Nursing
Veterans AffairsGI Bill®Comparison Tool
Veterans AffairsMilitary Ranks
Veterans AffairsVA Education and Training Benefits

Recommendations Based on the Experience of Nursing Programs

Follow the academic credit recommendations provided by the American Council of Education regarding military courses so that military nursing students can apply college credits toward core education requirements and possibly the nursing curriculum.Allen et al., 2014
Validate competencies for prior military medical education in order to prevent redundancy, as well as discover any gaps in knowledge.Allen et al., 2014; Hurlbut & Revuelto, 2018
Contemplate a fast-track option for military students to reduce the time it takes for them to complete a nursing program.Allen et al., 2014; Voelpel et al., 2018
Provide specialized orientation programs to retain military nursing students.D'Aoust et al, 2016
Be proactive and provide interventions to promote the academic success of military nursing students.Allen et al., 2014
Although military nursing students may appear to be similar to accelerated second-degree students because they are older and bring life experiences to the classroom, acknowledge that for many this will be their first time on a physical campus.Allen et al., 2014
Provide student advisors (and/or Veteran case managers and/or a military liaison) who are competent in both the military and higher education communities and/or can help military nursing students navigate convoluted benefits.Allen et al., 2014; Morrison-Beedy & Rossiter, 2018; Voelpel et al., 2018
Recognize that there is a post-9/11 G.I. Bill backlog that affects a nursing student's academic and living expenses; hence, reimbursement from Veteran's Affairs may be delayed but this should not affect a student's progression in the program.Allen et al., 2014; Allen et al., 2012; D'Aoust et al., 2016; Voelpel et al., 2018
Learn what you can about the transition process of military nursing students into academia, as well as military culture, in order to best advise/counsel them.Allen et al., 2014; Allen et al., 2012; D'Aoust et al., 2016; Dyar, 2016; Voelpel et al., 2018
Develop training modules for faculty, staff, and/or clinical partners to better understand military nursing students.D'Aoust et al, 2016; Morrison-Beedy & Rossiter, 2018
Offer primers on military culture, as well as the care of military patients and their families.Morrison-Beedy & Rossiter, 2018; Moss et al., 2015
Incorporate scaffolding for clinical experiences, using a Clinical Coach model whereby the military nursing student is paired with the same baccalaureate nursing degree preceptor for most clinical rotations.Allen et al., 2014
Consider allowing students who are activated to complete both didactic and clinical experiences while deployed.Eddy & Hill, 2005
Establish opportunities to recognize military nursing students (e.g., Veterans Day celebrations and/or creating a military challenge coin for the nursing program), as well as socialize them to academia.Morrison-Beedy & Rossiter, 2018; Voelpel et al., 2018
Conduct nursing research on this unique student population and/or patients who are Veterans.Dyar, 2016; Morrison-Beedy & Rossiter, 2018
Designate a Veteran lounge for military students.Hurlbut & Revuelto, 2018

Dr. Cox is Associate Professor, School of Nursing, George Washington University, Ashburn, Virginia, and retired Navy Nurse.

The author has disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

The author thanks Elaine Sullo, MLS, MAEd, Coordinator, Information and Instructional Services, Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library, George Washington University, Washington, DC, for her expertise and guidance with the literature search.

Address correspondence to Catherine Wilson Cox, PhD, RN, CEN, CNE, Associate Professor, School of Nursing, George Washington University, Innovation Hall, Suite 201-U, 45085 University Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147; e-mail:

Received: November 27, 2018
Accepted: April 09, 2019


Sign up to receive

Journal E-contents