Journal of Gerontological Nursing

Endnotes Free

COVID-19 Guidelines for Assisted Living Facilities: Lessons Learned

Susanne W. Gibbons, PhD, AGPCNP-BC; Paula Kowalewski, MSN, AGPCNP-BC

Older adults are a population at risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes. As the pandemic struck the United States, long-term care settings were quickly seen as places where COVID-19 can spread rapidly and be deadly (Kimball et al., 2020; Roxby et al., 2020). Intervening on behalf of the older adult population became a public health priority as experts considered approaches to manage infection control (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020a,b). All older adult care settings have a congregate focus where socialization and related activities are key components to well-being. However, as differences among settings became apparent, assisted living (AL) communities posed unique challenges for planning and responding to the COVID-19 threat. A situation of surplus safety exists, reducing risk at all costs, that conflicts with the usual AL philosophy (Thomas, n.d.). In an effort to identify areas for practice improvement, the current article presents non–COVID-19 problems uncovered by adult geriatric primary care nurse practitioners caring for assisted living facility (ALF) residents, that arose due to ALF quarantine restrictions.

Assisted Living Facilities

ALFs' basic philosophy encourages individualism, choice, and social engagement opportunities. Approximately 40% of older adults in long-term care reside in AL (Harris-Kojetin et al., 2016). Although >70% have some cognitive impairment, AL residents are an active group who enjoy taking trips together, with some still driving their own cars (Zimmerman et al., 2020; Zimmerman et al., 2014). AL residents remain engaged with the surrounding communities where they shop, eat meals, and often socialize with family and friends. Even those residing in ALF locked dementia units exist communally and appear to benefit from their freedom. AL provides a social hub important to the well-being of its residents.

More than 50% of AL residents are older than 80, and many have one or more comorbid conditions implicated in COVID-19, such as heart disease, diabetes, and chronic lung disease (Harris-Kojetin et al., 2016). Needless to say, AL communities attract increasingly frail older adults who benefit from 24-hour supervision for activities of daily living (ADL) care and receive two or more meals per day. However, the ALF model does not provide skilled nursing care (Zimmerman et al., 2020). Although many ALFs frequently have neighborhoods for individuals living with dementia, they do not have the same regulatory requirements as nursing homes. Regulations vary from state to state and in some locales, ALF nursing presence is not required. Families therefore assume the role of monitoring residents' health and well-being.

Older adults in ALFs engage in limited amounts of physical activity, with the majority spending their time in sedentary activity, such as reading or watching television (Resnick et al., 2018). Through their focus on socializing, ALFs are structured to encourage physical activity, which is beneficial because inactivity leads to negative physical and mental health outcomes in older adults (Diaz et al., 2017). Physical activity is therefore naturally incorporated into residents' days through activities, such as walking to meals and walking to attend recreational and other fun events. If an ALF resident has mobility problems or falls, physical therapy is ordered to improve ambulation ability and safety. Outpatient physical and occupational services are frequently used in ALFs to keep residents active and involved in life.

Experts creating pandemic guidelines acknowledged the uniqueness, limitations, and challenges of ALFs with regard to halting the transmission of COVID-19 and saving lives. Unprecedented restrictions on ALFs protect residents, many of whom have been spared from infection; however, residents' families have not been allowed to visit, and most residents remain in their apartments, unable to enjoy movement throughout the facility that previously kept them connected, strong, and well. Subsequently, many ALF residents experience unintended consequences of quarantine—social isolation, immobility, and lack of family involvement. Lessons learned from the ALF COVID-19 experience, what went well and what did not go well, and suggestions of how we can do better are described.

Covid-19 Quarantine: Lessons Learned

Surplus safety, a concept developed by Dr. Judah Rouch of the Erickson School and Dr. William Thomas of Eden Alternatives and Greenhouse Project, presents providers with a new way to understand older adult risk (Bowman, 2020; PHI, 2012). Three definitions of this concept include: (a) risk, which is concerned with deviation of an outcome from a particular benchmark; (b) downside risk, a type of risk involving surplus safety, where the likelihood is increased that an outcome is worse than the benchmark; and (c) upside risk, which refers to the likelihood an outcome is better than the benchmark. Furthermore, surplus safety involved in downside risk occurs through restrictive policies in care settings that might eliminate a feared outcome but in the process create new, sometimes worse, problems. In the case of current quarantines in AL communities, adaptations to completely eliminate risk of COVID-19 older adult infection by way of restrictive policies have, in many situations, resulted in more harm than good.

AL community COVID-19 guidelines for aggressive infection control to protect older adults in long-term care as set forth by federal, state, and local entities were largely successful; however, quarantine restrictions in ALFs resulted in less desirable adult outcomes. Table A (available in the online version of this article) outlines mechanisms, aside from customary infection control nursing practices with personal protective equipment (PPE) use (e.g., mask, visor, gowns, gloves as appropriate), put in place to reduce introduction and contain spread of COVID-19 in ALFs. Unfortunately, many communities limited entrance into ALFs not only by family and friends, but also by physical therapists, occupational therapists, lab technicians, skilled nurses, geriatric psychiatry personnel, and others who provide critical services for maintaining health and wellness of their residents. Jenq et al. (2020) express concerns with separating older adults from their loved ones indefinitely, noting the pandemic will likely add to loneliness and social isolation already plaguing many older people. Her team indicates high risk for non–COVID-19 deaths from outcomes such as falls, worsening chronic conditions, and deterioration of emotional health; all of which have become the reality and are expanded upon next. Table B (available in the online version of this article) shows recommended person-centered approaches to ameliorate outcomes due to non–COVID-19 problems in ALF residents.

Mechanisms to reduce COVID 19 in ALFs

Table A:

Mechanisms to reduce COVID 19 in ALFs

Patient-Centered Care in the ALF During COVID-19 PandemicPatient-Centered Care in the ALF During COVID-19 PandemicPatient-Centered Care in the ALF During COVID-19 Pandemic

Table B:

Patient-Centered Care in the ALF During COVID-19 Pandemic

Recommendations for Practice

A prolonged period of deprived social, cognitive, and sensorimotor stimulation of isolated older adults can lead to devastating results and premature death (Mehrabi & Béland, 2020; Plagg et al., 2020). Sadly, dining rooms in ALFs closed at the beginning of the pandemic and residents are required to eat in their rooms, despite the fact that communal dining improves eating habits in older adults, whereas social isolation often causes weight loss. One recommendation is to seat residents in small groups, safely spaced apart. Often the food served in a resident's room is less appealing because facilities use Styrofoam™ containers and food quickly becomes cold. As lack of food palatability can be a problem, staff need to be more vigilant than usual with monitoring resident consumption habits and meal quality.

Although the intent of social distancing is not social disengagement, oftentimes residents struggling with cognitive decline become disengaged, lonely, and depressed when isolated. We recommend a true buddy system, where an older person is paired with someone else in the community, and more freedom to roam. We recommend more outdoor time for residents. Outdoor activities are safer than indoor activities as long as there is a safe social distance being maintained. Getting closer to nature is beneficial for everyone, including older adults. We recommend a variety of older adult–appropriate activities with spacing that allows for social distancing while providing engagement and fun. Proper social distancing is a safe solution to the problems caused by social isolation.

Despite the fact that quarantining in a room or apartment keeps ALF residents safe, it also reduces their level of activity, leading to weakness as well as complications of immobility. Complications of immobility include traumatic falls, fractures, deep vein thromboses, and pulmonary emboli, which can lead to death. Serious consequences of isolation in quarantine require us to question whether these precautions are ultimately beneficial to residents. We recommend physical therapy and occupational therapy assessments and ongoing evaluations with identification of residents showing signs of decline to engage and strengthen them. We recommend daily personal exercise routines, such as chair exercises or other geriatric-recommended workouts, to make up for lost physical exercise caused by staying in their rooms.

Although residents' family members live outside of the ALF and may be exposed to COVID-19 and possibly be asymptomatic carriers, their involvement in the life of their loved one is critical for identifying subtle changes. Many times, family members are the first to notice subtle changes in mood, appetite, and interests. We have seen videoconferencing with family and friends, although fine for the short-term, it does not have the same effect as contact with real people (Crewdson, 2016). We recommend one or two special family members be allowed regular visitation with their ALF resident. We encourage family members to bring favorite foods. We recommend that family members participate in the life of their loved one by watching television with them, playing games, and finding unique and entertaining ways to pass the time.

Due to increased frailty in ALF residents, end-of-life (EOL) care with hospice and palliative services increased during the pandemic period. Home hospice or community hospice personnel serve most ALFs, coming into the facility to assist and guide EOL care. However, in some instances, certain hospice workers, such as aides who assist with ADL care, chaplains who provide spiritual support, and volunteers who provide one-onone time for reminiscence and other pleasant activities, have been restricted from entering the facility, thereby limiting and blocking specialized care. Even more sad, family visits can be restricted and have time constraints—unbelievable but true—during a precious time when residents need family most. Such restrictions are an infringement on patient and family rights. Although visitation restrictions are for everyone's protection, safety requirements for visitors, such as wearing PPE, decrease chance of exposure for residents. Therefore, family visits for dying residents should not be limited and time constrained because they are crucial in providing comfort during a difficult and important period in life.

Recommendations for Policy

Although the intent of guidelines for ALF preparedness to manage the COVID-19 pandemic and protect residents from infection appear to decrease COVID-19 in ALFs, from our experience consequences of isolation, lack of family involvement, and immobility unintentionally increased some older adult residents' risk for morbidity and mortality due to other unanticipated problems. Efforts are needed to eliminate surplus safety. In an evolving pandemic situation such as COVID-19, alternate policies should be instituted as our understanding of the disease and how it spreads changes. Masks for ambulatory non-cognitively impaired residents can increase their freedom within the community. Required routine COVID-19 testing of family members who frequent the community to support their older adults will decrease the likelihood of introduction and spread of disease. Currently, ALFs reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission by vigilantly monitoring the health of health care workers and their infection control behaviors and by sanitizing surfaces (Dosa et al., 2020). ALF personnel diligently work toward having the staffing and infrastructure in place to meet the demands of a vulnerable group of older adults when and if COVID-19 enters their community (Zimmerman et al., 2020). However, through controlling the environments and providing alternate methods for care and communication, they unknowingly strip older adults of the key elements that make their existence in the ALF worthwhile.

Conclusion

Violation of patient and family rights must be addressed. Have the restrictions gone too far for the benefit of protecting everyone? In some instances, residents are required to isolate further if they choose to leave the community for a required medical visit or treatment, whereas staff come and go each day. These new restrictions on residents appear punitive in nature. These requirements may even cause residents to refrain from getting necessary medical care.

With so little time left, efforts should be made to grant older adults the agency to make decisions surrounding their day-to-day experiences as well as to maximize time with loved ones. For older adults, wellness is more than sickness or health—it pertains to quality of life. In late life, quality equates to function—what an older person can do. We must provide person-centered care by attending to older adults' physical, emotional, spiritual, and social needs—even amid the current pandemic. We must keep our ALF residents well, not just safe.

Susanne W. Gibbons, PhD, AGPCNP-BC
Paula Kowalewski, MSN, AGPCNP-BC
Gilchrist Elder Medical Care
Greater Baltimore Medical Center
Towson, Maryland

References

  • Bowman, C. (2012, October15). Surplus safety: A symposium to redefine risk. Green House Blog. https://blog.thegreenhouseproject.org/surplus-safety-a-symposium-to-redefine-risk/
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020a, May29). Considerations for preventing spread of COVID-19 in assisted living facilities. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/assisted-living.html
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020b, October21). Overview of testing for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/clinical-criteria.html
  • Crewdson, J. A. (2016). The effect of loneliness in the elderly population: A review. Healthy Aging & Clinical Care in the Elderly, 8, 1–8 doi:10.4137/HACCE.S35890 [CrossRef]
  • Diaz, K. M., Howard, V. J., Hutto, B., Colabianchi, N., Vena, J. E., Safford, M. M., Blair, S. N. & Hooker, S. P. (2017). Patterns of sedentary behavior and mortality in U.S. middle-aged and older adults: A national cohort study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 167(7), 465–475 doi:10.7326/M17-0212 [CrossRef] PMID:28892811
  • Dosa, D., Jump, R. L. P., LaPlante, K. & Gravenstein, S. (2020). Long-term care facilities and the coronavirus epidemic: Practical guidelines for a population at highest risk. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 21, 569–571 doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.03.004 [CrossRef] PMID:32179000
  • Harris-Kojetin, L., Sengupta, M., Park-Lee, E., Valverde, R., Caffrey, C., Rome, V. & Lendon, J. (2016). Long-term care providers and services users in the United States: Data from the National Study of Long-Term Care Providers, 2013–2014. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_03/sr03_038.pdf
  • Jenq, G. Y., Mills, J. P. & Malani, P. N. (2020). Preventing COVID-19 in assisted living facilities: A balancing act. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(8), 1106–1107 PMID:32437551
  • Kimball, A., Hatfield, K. M., Arons, M., James, A., Taylor, J., Spicer, K., Bardossy, A. C., Oakley, L. P., Tanwar, S., Chisty, Z., Bell, J. M., Methner, M., Harney, J., Jacobs, J. R., Carlson, C. M., McLaughlin, H. P., Stone, N., Clark, S., Brostrom-Smith, C. & Jernigan, J. A.the Public Health – Seattle & King County & the CDC COVID-19 Investigation Team. (2020). Asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARSCoV-2 infections in residents of long-term care skilled nursing facility—King County, Washington. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report., 69(13), 377–381 doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6913e1 [CrossRef] PMID:32240128
  • Mehrabi, F. & Béland, F. (2020). Effects of social isolation, loneliness and frailty on health outcomes and their possible mediators and moderators in community-dwelling older adults: A scoping review. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 90, 104119 doi:10.1016/j.archger.2020.104119 [CrossRef] PMID:32562956
  • PHI. (2012, October5). Surplus safety: A new way to understand risk. https://phinational.org/surplus-safety-a-new-way-to-understand-risk/
  • Plagg, B., Engl, A., Piccoliori, G. & Eisendle, K. (2020). Prolonged social isolation of the elderly during COVID-19: Between benefit and damage. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 89, 104086 doi:10.1016/j.archger.2020.104086 [CrossRef] PMID:32388336
  • Resnick, B., Galik, E., Boltz, M., Vigne, E., Holmes, S., Fix, S. & Zhu, S. (2018). Physical activity and function in assisted living residents. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 40(12), 1734–1748 doi:10.1177/0193945918764448 [CrossRef] PMID:29560808
  • Roxby, A. C., Greninger, A. L., Hatfield, K. M., Lynch, J. B., Dellit, T. H., James, A., Taylor, J., Page, L. C., Kimball, A., Arons, M., Schieve, L. A., Munanga, A., Stone, N., Jernigan, J. A., Reddy, S. C., Lewis, J., Cohen, S. A., Jerome, K. R., Duchin, J. S. & Neme, S. (2020). Detection of SARS-CoV-2 among residents and staff members of an independent and assisted living community for older adults—Seattle, Washington, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly, 69(14), 416–418 doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6914e2 [CrossRef] PMID:32271726
  • Thomas, B. (n.d.). Surplus safety symposium. https://changingaging.org/culture-change/surplus-safety-symposium/
  • Zimmerman, S., Sloane, P. D., Katz, P. R., Kunze, M., O'Neil, K. & Resnick, B. (2020). The need to include assisted living in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 21, 572–575 doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.03.024 [CrossRef] PMID:32334770
  • Zimmerman, S., Sloane, P. D. & Reed, D.2014). Dementia prevalence and care in assisted living. Health Affairs, 33(4), 658–666 doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1255 [CrossRef] PMID:24711328

Mechanisms to reduce COVID 19 in ALFs

CDC Recommendations for Reducing COVID-19 Infection and Spread in the ALF
Avoid presenteeism (employee working while sick by instituting flexible sick leave policy)Social distancing
Strict isolation policiesClean and disinfect high touch areas
Test residents unable to comply with CDC recommendations (i.e., dementia) and those at high risk for severe complicationsDaily symptom screening of all entering facilities
Coordinate transfers to and from COVID-19 locationsTesting symptomatic and in certain situations asymptomatic health care workers/employees

Patient-Centered Care in the ALF During COVID-19 Pandemic

COVID-19 RestrictionResident OutcomeRecommendations for Practice
Social IsolationDepression and AnxietyNursing assessment for changes in mood Socially distanced activities inside the facility and outdoors Buddy system within the facility Video conferences for contact with friends and family Family visitation Low threshold for treatment Gero-psychiatry consultation
DehydrationNursing assessment of hydration status Drink carts with water and other fluids offered between meals
AnorexiaNursing assessment of food intake Increase frequency of weights Snacks and supplements between meals Offer palatable food Provide communal eating with social distancing
Lack of Family InvolvementMissed signs and symptoms of declineFrequent nursing checks throughout the day Family visitation Nurses to monitor for signs and symptoms of worsening chronic illness Nurses to monitor vital signs and assess for common infections, such as urinary tract, pneumonia, and skin infections
Increased ImmobilityIncreased FrailtyNursing to monitor for increased weakness Institute fall precautions Hospice and palliative service consults when appropriate
FallsNursing to monitor fall risk Structured routine exercises 3 times a day, 7 days a week Physical therapy for strengthening, gait training, and balance Occupational therapy for functional recommendations and adaptations
Deep Vein Thromboses (DVTs) and Pulmonary Emboli (PE)Nursing to monitor for signs and symptoms of DVT or PE Low threshold for ordering venous Doppler studies Maintain resident physical activity throughout the day
Authors

The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of Gilchrist Elder Medical Care or Greater Baltimore Medical Center.

10.3928/00989134-20210113-04

Sign up to receive

Journal E-contents