Perspective from William Dolphin, MA
January 28, 2019
3 min read
Save

Canadian Rheumatology Association: Medical cannabis not a substitute to standard care

Perspective from William Dolphin, MA
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Medical cannabis is not an alternative to standard of care for any rheumatic disease, and rheumatologists must exhaust all current treatment strategies for pain and sleeplessness — including nonpharmacologic methods — before considering a trial for cannabinoid products, according to a position statement released by the Canadian Rheumatology Association.

“The [Canadian Rheumatology Association (CRA)] recognizes the need for improved pain relief in patients with rheumatic diseases,” the statement noted. “With the legalization of cannabis, Canadians are increasingly turning to their physicians for guidance regarding medical cannabis use, which has already entered mainstream medicine. Medical cannabis has not been subject to the standard review required for drug approval by Health Canada.”

According to the statement, “In the absence of studies examining the effects of medical cannabis in patients with rheumatic diseases, rheumatologists should be prepared to offer pragmatic advice in a caring and empathetic way to ensure harm reduction.”

Marijuana plant 
Medical cannabis is not an alternative to standard of care for any rheumatic disease, according to a position statement released by the CRA.
Source: Adobe

In a list of 11 overarching principals included the position statement, the CRA stressed the dearth of published studies on the effects of medical cannabis among patients with rheumatic diseases. In addition, according to the statement, the few studies currently available that have examined medicinal cannabinoids report limited benefits and a high risk for adverse events.

Although the CRA acknowledged that medical cannabis may provide symptom relief for some patients with rheumatic diseases, the group added that it is also highly associated with numerous short-term adverse effects, including immediate psychomotor effects, dizziness, appetite changes and effect on mood, and the rare serious adverse effects of disorientation and psychosis. In addition, the long-term risks associated with medical cannabis among patients with rheumatic diseases remain unknown, according to the statement.

However, the CRA also noted that patients may seek out a prescription for medical cannabis, and may already using it to self-medicate to treat pain and sleeplessness.

When considering a trial of medical cannabis, the CRA reported that rheumatologists should avoid cannabinoid treatments among patients who are younger than 25 years, those with allergic reactions to cannabinoid products, women who are pregnant or breastfeeding and those with a history of psychotic illness, substance abuse disorder, previous suicide attempts or suicidal ideation.

In addition, rheumatologists considering a medical cannabis trial should have a full clinical knowledge of the patient and clearly discuss with the patient treatment goals and possible adverse events. The CRA also advised that cannabis should not be smoked, but rather inhaled through a vaporizer or consumed orally, and that products with lower THC and higher CBD are preferable. Patients receiving medical cannabis treatment should start with a nighttime dose, with a slow increase to a maximum of 3 g of dried product or equivalent, the statement read.

PAGE BREAK

Rheumatologists should follow patients treated with cannabis for 4 to 8 weeks after initiation and should discontinue treatment in the absence of any appreciable clinical effect, or in the event of substantial adverse effects. Patients who continue cannabinoid treatment should be re-evaluated at least every 3 months to assess efficacy, according to the CRA.

“Despite a patient’s understanding of the lack of scientific evidence to support a benefit, and the potential increased risk of harms, some patients may choose a trial of medical cannabis over other options,” the statement noted. “Rheumatologists must endeavor to maintain an empathetic therapeutic relationship with their patients, avoid personal biases, and ensure harm reduction for both patients and society.” – by Jason Laday