Focus On: Physician Burnout

Focus On: Physician Burnout

May 31, 2018
3 min read
Save

Broadening scope of family practice reduces physician burnout

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Amanda Weidner
Amanda K. H. Weidner

Early career family physicians who deliver a broader scope of care have significantly lower rates of burnout, according to findings recently reported in Annals of Family Medicine.

Study author Amanda K.H. Weidner, MPH, of the department of family medicine at the University of Washington, told Healio Family Medicine the idea for the study came as she heard friends and colleagues talk about their work and their work-life balance and recognized how problematic burnout could be for health care professionals.

“I started to think about burnout and its associations in the context of family physicians after looking at some data from our graduate follow-up surveys at the University of Washington Family Medicine Residency Network,” Weidner said in an interview.

She and her research colleagues analyzed 1,617 responses from the 2016 National Family Medicine Graduate Survey. They compared self-reports of burnout and measures of scope of practice involving pediatric ambulatory care, obstetrics, inpatient medicine, number of procedures and/or clinical content areas, and delivering care outside the primary practice site.

Weidner and colleagues found that of the 42% of respondents reported burnout more than once a week. After adjusted analysis, practice characteristics significantly linked to lower odds for burnout were practicing inpatient medicine (OR = 0.7; 95% CI, 0.56-0.87) and obstetrics (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.88).

In addition, bivariate analysis showed components of practice linked to lower burnout rates included providing more procedures/clinical content areas (mean procedures/clinical areas: 7.49 vs. 7.02; P = .02); and working in more settings than the principal practice site (one-plus additional settings: 57.6% vs. 48.4%: P = .001), particularly in the hospital (31.4% vs. 24.2%; P = .002) and patient homes (3.3% vs. 1.5%; P = .02).

“I imagine that a broader scope of care gives more diversity of activity in a family physician’s day, which keeps things more interesting, engaging, and enriching,” Weidner said of the results. “It may be more logistically challenging and maybe more tiring to be moving around to different care locations and to keep up-to-date on a greater variety of clinical knowledge, but it seems that it would be more interesting than what can sometimes feel like a ‘hamster wheel’ of outpatient clinical care seeing as many patients as possible with little diversity in ailments and encounters.”

“We do think it is important, however, to note that forcing all family physicians to practice obstetrics and inpatient medicine is not the take home message of this study. Instead, health systems should make sure these sorts of jobs are available for family physicians who desire to practice the broad scope of care for which they have the training (and that these jobs have enough flexibility and reasonable work effort expectations that they are doable),” she continued.

“Given that studies have shown that physician burnout is extremely costly to health systems (and that comprehensiveness is associated with reduced costs), offering jobs that have flexibility in what is included in the physician’s set of clinical duties seems to be in everyone’s best interest,” Weidner concluded. – by Janel Miller

Disclosure: Weidner reports no relevant financial disclosures. Please see the study for the other authors’ relevant financial disclosures.

Editor's Note: This story has been updated to reflect a revision to the original source article.