November 13, 2014
1 min read

TFA a potential alternative to amputation for patients with massive femoral bone deficiency

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact

Although total femoral arthroplasty performed poorly among patients with infection and instability, the procedure was a viable alternative to amputation in patients with massive femoral bone deficiency, according to study results.

Researchers retrospectively reviewed 20 patients who underwent non-oncologic total femoral arthroplasties (TFAs) and a minimum of 2 years follow-up.

The researchers found a 25% incidence of new non-oncologic TFA infection and a 35% overall infection rate.

After non-oncologic TFA, the incidence of primary hip instability was 10%, and overall instability was 25%. A statistically significant 35-point increase from preoperative to postoperative Harris Hip Scores was observed, according to the researchers.

Through individual evaluation of clinical complaints, the researchers found that only 10% of patients continued to complain of pain postoperatively.

Thirty percent of patients were non-ambulatory and confined to a wheelchair at final follow-up, and 70% were ambulatory after non-oncologic TFA, with seven requiring a walker, four requiring use of a cane and three with no ambulatory gait aid.

Revision for any failure mode was performed in 30% of the patients studied. Hip instability and infection were the most common modes of failure, according to the researchers.

Disclosure: See the study for a full list of all authors’ relevant financial disclosures.