Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI)
Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI)
Issue: April 2013
Perspective from Richard Chaisson, MD
Perspective from David Cohn, MD
March 06, 2013
1 min read
Save

Once-weekly treatment effective as daily treatment in TB continuation phase

Issue: April 2013
Perspective from Richard Chaisson, MD
Perspective from David Cohn, MD
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

ATLANTA — A 6-month tuberculosis treatment regimen with once-weekly rifapentine and moxifloxacin in the 4-month continuation phase was noninferior to the standard treatment, Amina Jindani, MD, of St. George’s, University of London, reported here.

“The WHO recommended treatment regimen is very effective,” Jindani said during a presentation at the 2013 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. “But effectiveness depends on adherence. We show that giving two drugs once a week in the 4-month continuation phase is as effective as giving two different drugs daily.”

Jindani and colleagues conducted the RIFAQUIN study, in which patients with smear-positive pulmonary TB were randomly assigned to three treatment arms: control, which included 2 months of daily ethambutol, isoniazid, rifampin and pyrazinamide (intensive phase), followed by a 4-month continuation phase of daily isoniazid and rifampin; a 4-month regimen in which moxifloxacin replaced isoniazid in the intensive phase and a 2-month continuation phase included twice-weekly moxifloxacin and 900 mg rifapentine (Priftin, Sanofi-Aventis); and a 6-month regimen in which moxifloxacin replaced isoniazid in the intensive phase and a 4-month continuation phase included once-weekly moxifloxacin and 1,200 mg rifapentine.

The study included 827 patients. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the difference in proportion unfavorable between the 4-month regimen and control was 11.9% (95% CI, 3.7-20), and in a per protocol analysis, the difference in proportion unfavorable was 13.2% (95% CI, 6.4-20). The difference between the 6-month regimen and control was –2% (95% CI, –8.9 to 4.9) in an intention-to-treat analysis, and –1.5% (95% CI, –5.7 to 2.8) in a per protocol analysis.

“The 6-month regimen with once-weekly 1,200 mg rifapentine and moxifloxacin in the continuation phase was noninferior to control, even at the 95% level, and was safe and well tolerated,” Jindani said.

For more information:

Jindani A. #147LB. Presented at: 2013 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; March 3-6, 2013; Atlanta

Disclosure: Jindani reports no relevant financial disclosures.