ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition
ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition
December 01, 2018
4 min read

Consolidative transplant after CAR T-cell therapy may benefit certain patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact

SAN DIEGO — Consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplant after CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy prolonged leukemia-free survival for certain pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory CD19-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, according to results of the PLAT-02 trial presented at ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition.

Patients who attained complete remission after CAR T-cell therapy but remained at risk for relapse with a short term B-cell aplasia derived particular benefit.

However, investigators observed no significant difference in OS between patients who underwent consolidative HSCT and those who did not. This could be due to response to salvage therapy, according to researcher Corinne Summers, MD, principal investigator at Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer Research at Seattle Children’s Research Institute, research associate at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and acting instructor at University of Washington.

“Longer-term follow-up is needed, and I suspect that we may see a spread from those two lines eventually,” Summers told HemOnc Today. “I’m happy that a lot of these patients who relapse after CAR T-cell therapy are salvageable with other therapies, but these are still very high-risk patients and we just need more time and more subjects under our belt.”

CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy has induced robust responses among patients with relapsed or refractory CD19-positive ALL.

In a phase 1 trial, 93% of patients achieved minimal residual disease-negative complete remission after infusion with SCRI-CAR19v1, a CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapy developed at Seattle Children’s Research Institute.

However, approximately half of patients who achieve remission experience recurrence, and the role of HSCT after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy remains controversial.

The institutional recommendation at Seattle Cancer Care Alliance suggests patients with relapsed or refractory disease who have no history of allogeneic HSCT undergo transplant if they achieve remission after SCRI-CAR19v1 infusion.

The institutional recommendation also suggests HSCT for patients who have a short duration of persistence of SCRI-CAR19v1 in vivo regardless of whether they underwent prior HSCT.

At ASH, Summers presented leukemia-free survival data for patients who achieved remission after SCRI-CAR19v1 infusion and proceeded to HSCT.

The retrospective analysis included 50 patients enrolled on the phase 1/phase 2 PLAT-02 trial. Eligibility criteria included age older than 12 months up to 27 years; relapsed or refractory CD19-poisitive B-ALL, no active graft-versus-host disease, and absolute lymphocyte count of at least 100/µl.

Of these 50 patients 32 were included in the phase 1 dose-finding segment of the study. The other 18 were treated on the phase 2 portion at a dose of 1 x 106 cells/kg.


All patients were followed for at least 1 year. Thirty-three (66%) had undergone at least one prior HSCT.

Objectives included evaluation of the role of allogeneic HSCT for maintaining leukemia-free survival and OS for patients who had sustained leukemic remission for more than 63 days after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.

Results showed patients who underwent HSCT after CAR T-cell therapy infusion achieved longer leukemia-free survival; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance. Investigators observed no OS difference between groups.

Researchers also observed a trend toward improved leukemia-free survival among patients who underwent first HSCT after CAR T-cell therapy infusion but, again, the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Of the 17 patients who had no HSCT history, three did not undergo HSCT after CAR T-cell therapy. One relapsed at 6 months with CD19-positive disease, one relapsed at 7 months with CD19-negative disease, and one remained in remission at 28 months.

Two of the 14 patients who underwent first HSCT after SCRI-CAR19v1 infusion relapsed after transplant. One of those had minimal residual disease detected by flow cytometry at the time of transplant and the other developed CD19-negative disease.

Among the 33 patients who had a history of HSCT, 10 underwent second HSCT after CAR T-cell therapy infusion. Five remained in remission at data cutoff. Eight of the 23 patients who did not undergo second HSCT remained in remission.

Prior results revealed patients with a short duration of B-cell aplasia within 63 days of SCRI-CAR19v1 infusion demonstrated increased relapse risk.

Long-term follow-up showed patients with short duration of B-cell aplasia who achieved complete remission and did not relapse prior to day 63 derived clear leukemia-free survival benefit from consolidative HSCT (P = 0.007).

Fifteen patients had short duration of B-cell aplasia. All six who did not undergo HSCT developed disease recurrence; these included five with CD19-positive disease and one with CD19-negative disease.

Nine patients with short duration of B-cell aplasia underwent HSCT. One died of treatment-related causes. Two others — one of whom was minimal residual disease positive prior to HSCT — relapsed after transplant.

All events among patients who underwent consolidative HSCT occurred by 20 months after CAR T-cell therapy infusion.

Late relapses continue to be observed among patients who did not proceed to HSCT. Three relapses occurred after 2 years. These included one case of CD19-positive disease at 27 months, one patient with lineage switch AML at 38 months, and one who developed CD19-negative disease at 41 months.


More research is necessary to understand the continued long-term risk for relapse after CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, as well as the potential role and timing for consolidative HSCT for patients who underwent prior HSCT, Summers and colleagues wrote.

“The benefit of second HSCT following CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is unclear and may be restricted to those [who] have short functional persistence of SCRI-CAR19v1,” researchers wrote. “Late relapses after SCRI-CAR19v1 have only occurred [among] those without consolidative HSCT, but longer follow-up is needed to confirm these findings.” – by Mark Leiser


Summers C, et al. Abstract 967. Presented at: ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; Dec. 1-4, 2018; San Diego.

Disclosure: Summers reports no relevant financial disclosures. One other author reports research funding from, consultant roles with and patents/royalties with Juno Therapeutics.