ASCO Annual Meeting

ASCO Annual Meeting

Perspective from Clifford A. Hudis, MD, FACP
Perspective from Tawee Tanvetyanon, MD
May 15, 2014
4 min read

Nationwide screening would increase lung cancer detection as well as costs

Perspective from Clifford A. Hudis, MD, FACP
Perspective from Tawee Tanvetyanon, MD
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact

Lung cancer screening conducted according to US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines would increase the number of detected cancers, particularly those in early stages, but it also would come at a considerable cost to Medicare, according to study results.

The USPSTF recommended annual lung cancer screening with low-dose CT for adults aged 55 to 80 years with a 30 pack-year smoking history who are current smokers or who quit within the past 15 years.

Joshua A. Roth, MD 

Joshua A. Roth

A draft decision regarding Medicare coverage of CT screening for lung cancer will be posted in November; however, the Medicare Evidence Development & Coverage Advisory Committee recently recommended against CMS coverage of annual screening, researcher Joshua A. Roth, PhD, MHA, a postdoctoral research fellow at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, WA, said during a press conference.

“With those recent developments in mind, we designed this study to project the 5-year clinical resource use and budget impact of implementing CT screening in the Medicare program,” Roth said. “We hope our findings can inform these ongoing debates about coverage.”

Roth and colleagues developed a model to evaluate 5-year incremental outcomes of annual screening based on USPSTF guidelines compared with no screening in a Medicare cohort. The researchers based the model on 2013 enrollment and age distribution statistics.

They calculated lung cancer detection rates and diagnosis stage based on data from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). Results of the trial, which provided the basis for the USPSTF guidelines, showed annual screening with low-dose CT reduced lung cancer deaths by 20%.

Researchers projected costs in three participation scenarios, each of which assumed an additional 20% of high-risk adults would be offered screening per year. The expected-use scenario predicted 50% of eligible adults would undergo screening according to mammography experience, the low-use scenario predicted 25% of adults would undergo screening, and the high-use scenario predicted 75% would undergo screening.

According to the expected-use scenario, annual screening would result in 11.2 million more low-dose CT scans and 54,900 more detected lung cancers compared with no screening. The proportion of detected lung cancers that are in the early stage would increase from 15% to 32% in this scenario.

Five-year Medicare costs — which include included low-dose CT screening and follow-up, bronchoscopy/biopsy workup and stage–specific lung cancer treatment — were $9.3 billion with the expected-use scenario, $5.9 billion with the low-use scenario, and $12.7 billion with the high-use scenario.

The expected-use scenario would result in a $3 monthly premium increase per Medicare member. The low-use scenario was associated with a $1.90 increase, and the high-use scenario was associated with a $4.10 increase.

“If we can diagnose lung cancers at an earlier stage, patients can be treated far more effectively and survival prognosis is much better,” Roth said in a press release. “However, the key to the success of this screening program is ensuring that those who are at high risk actually undergo screening and subsequently receive appropriate treatment.”

Further analyses are planned to evaluate the demand for scanner and technologist resources vs. availability of existing facilities, the researchers said.

For more information:

Roth JA. Abstract #6501. Scheduled for presentation at: 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting; May 30-June 3, 2014; Chicago.

Disclosure: The study was funded by Genentech. The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.