Source/Disclosures
Source:

Sanniec K, et al. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 2017;doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003540.

April 11, 2017
1 min read
Save

Study explores nuances of forehead flap nasal reconstruction

Source/Disclosures
Source:

Sanniec K, et al. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 2017;doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003540.

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Forehead flap nasal reconstruction may be safe and effective as an outpatient procedure in older patients.

The researchers retrospectively analyzed 420 patients with an average age older than 65 years who underwent forehead flap nasal reconstruction. All procedures were performed over a 10-year period by a single clinician. Factors that underwent analysis included “defect location, pedicle design, time of division, number of stages, use of cartilage grafts, lining reconstruction, donor site closure and complications,” according to the results.

Results indicated an average duration to pedicle division of 32 days. Two stages of reconstruction were required for 75% of the cohort. Nasal ala and tip were the most commonly reported defects.

Cartilage grafts were used in 57% of procedures, and the same proportion of patients underwent lining reconstruction.

The complication rate was 3.8%. Tip necrosis was the most commonly reported complication, along with partial flap loss. There was one fatality. – by Rob Volansky

 

Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.