Adults with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease who take the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin can expect to live between 1 and 5 years longer than those without the drug, depending on the person’s age when initiating treatment, according to an actuarial analysis of the EMPA-REG Outcome trial published in Circulation.
“It was already known that empagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of death,” Brian Claggett, PhD, assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, told Endocrine Today. “We were then interested in attempting to translate that reduction into something more concrete and meaningful that a doctor and patient could discuss. Regardless of whether you're aged 45 or 80 years, we believe that empagliflozin would produce a 12% to 15% increase in life expectancy. That could mean as much as 4 additional years of life for some patients. Of course, these estimates will need to be validated with true, long-term follow-up of patients taking empagliflozin.”
Claggett and colleagues performed an actuarial analysis of data from EMPA-REG to estimate the long-term benefit of empagliflozin therapy (Jardiance, Boehringer Ingelheim) on the residual life span, estimating the effect of empagliflozin vs. placebo on all-cause mortality during the duration of patients’ lifetimes using patient age, rather than time since randomization, as the time scale.
Results from EMPA-REG, first presented in September 2015 and reported by Endocrine Today, showed that empagliflozin reduced the risk for CV death by 38% compared with placebo, with no significant difference in the risk for nonfatal myocardial infacrtion or stroke. Patients treated with empagliflozin also experienced a 32% reduction in all-cause mortality risk and a 35% reduction in risk for hospitalization for heart failure, according to researchers. The study included more than 7,000 adults with type 2 diabetes, BMI 45 kg/m² or less, HbA1c between 7% and 10% and an established history of CVD (mean age, 63 years; 72% men; mean HbA1c, 8%; mean BMI, 30.6 kg/m²)
The researchers produced actuarial estimates of the age-specific probabilities of death for the pooled empagliflozin group and the placebo group, and used those estimates to obtain nonparametric, age-based Kaplan-Meier estimates of the survival curve for patients at each year of age in each treatment group.
For patients in each treatment group at each year of age, researchers estimated expected residual years of survival as area under the survival curve up to a maximum of age 90 years, repeating the process for patients aged 45 to 80 years.
The researchers found that estimated mean survival was longer with empagliflozin vs. placebo across all ages.
Beginning at age 45 years, estimated mean survival for patients assigned to empagliflozin was 32.1 years vs. 27.6 years for those assigned to placebo, for a difference of 4.5 years (95% CI, 1.3-7.8). At age 50 years, estimated mean survival was 28.5 years vs. 25.4 years for patients assigned to empagliflozin and placebo, respectively, for a difference of 3.1 years (95% CI, 0.9-5.3). The survival difference favoring empagliflozin was 2.5 years at age 60 years (P = .001), 2 years at age 70 years (P = .003) and 1 year at age 80 years (P = .13), according to the researchers.
“The absolute increases in mean survival with empagliflozin vs. placebo decreased with age, whereas the relative increases were consistent regardless of age and ranged between 12% and 15%,” the researchers wrote.
The researchers noted that an alternative analysis that assumes complete adherence would likely show even greater benefits.
“For a 60-year-old living with type 2 diabetes who has already had a cardiovascular event, previous studies estimate that life expectancy could be reduced by up to 12 years compared with someone of the same age without these conditions,” Claggett said in a press release. “This latest analysis estimates that empagliflozin could prolong such a person’s life span by, on average, 2.5 years.” – by Regina Schaffer
For more information:
Brian Claggett, PhD,
can be reached at the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115; email: email@example.com.
Disclosures: Claggett reports he has received consultant fees from AO Biome, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corvia and Gilead. Please see the study for the other authors’ relevant financial disclosures.