Trauma Update

Tibial Tubercle Avulsion Fractures in Adolescent Basketball Players

Andre Jakoi, MD; Michael Freidl, MD; Andrew Old, MD; Mitra Javandel, MD; James Tom, MD; Juan Realyvasquez, MD

  • Orthopedics
  • August 2012 - Volume 35 · Issue 8: 692-696
  • DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120725-07
Rights and Permissions

Abstract

Tibial tubercle avulsion fractures most commonly occur in adolescent boys and usually result from pushing off or landing while jumping. These fractures are relatively uncommon but can have a significant functional effect. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcome with return to play in 8 adolescent basketball players with at least 4 years of postoperative reconditioning. Results with return to play at the preinjury level are favorable after treatment of acute tibial avulsion fractures in adolescent basketball players. Long-term outcome was excellent in all patients regardless of fracture type. Open reduction and internal fixation using 1 or 2 cancellous bone screws achieved union in all cases.

Drs Jakoi, Freidl, Old, Javandel, Tom, and Realyvasquez are from the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Drexel College of Medicine, and Dr Realyvasquez is also from the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Christopher’s Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Drs Jakoi, Freidl, Old, Javandel, Tom, and Realyvasquez have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Correspondence should be addressed to: Andre Jakoi, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Drexel College of Medicine, 245 N 15th St, Mail Stop 420, Philadelphia, PA 19102 (ajakoi22@gmail.com).

Tibial tubercle avulsion fractures most commonly occur in adolescent boys during the transitional phase of physeal closure prior to completion of growth.1–3 The injury is usually isolated, resulting from pushing off or landing while jumping as the quadriceps eccentrically contract, causing a direct force to be placed at the area of the patellar tendon insertion.1,2 These injuries are relatively uncommon, with a reported incidence between 0.4% and 2.7% of all epiphyseal injuries and less than 1% of all physeal injuries.1 However, they can have a significant functional effect; thus, swift and successful management of these injuries is imperative.

Previous studies have described the mechanism of injury and treatment.1–9 Few studies have had long-term follow-up regarding patient satisfaction and outcome after the procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcome with return to play in 8 adolescent basketball players who were managed for acute tibial avulsion fractures with at least 4 years of postoperative reconditioning.

Materials and Methods

After institutional review board approval, the authors conducted a retrospective review of 8 consecutive adolescent basketball players who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for acute tibial tubercle avulsion fractures by the senior author (J.R.) between August 2003 and September 2007. All patients were immobilized in a cylinder cast or brace for 4 weeks postoperatively. Medical records were reviewed to identify age, sex, involved side, fracture type by the Ogden classification (modification of Watson-Jones), concomitant injuries, treatment, complications, and outcomes after return to play.

Open reduction and internal fixation was performed using 1 or 2 screws, depending on fracture type. Dissection was performed through an anterior approach to the tibial tubercle using a midline vertical incision. Cancellous bone screws were then used to secure the fracture fragments. Screws were placed horizontally through the tubercle into the metaphysis under fluoroscopic guidance, taking care to avoid overpenetration of the posterior tibial cortex. A single screw was used to secure type 2 fractures. Two screws were used for type 3 fractures (Figures 13).

Lateral radiograph of the right knee with type IIIA tibial tubercle avulsion fracture.

Figure 1: Lateral radiograph of the right knee with type IIIA tibial tubercle avulsion fracture.

Postoperative lateral radiograph of the right knee after 2-screw insertion for the treatment of type IIIA tibial tubercle avulsion fracture.

Figure 2: Postoperative lateral radiograph of the right knee after 2-screw insertion for the treatment of type IIIA tibial tubercle avulsion fracture.

Postoperative anteroposterior radiograph of the right knee after treatment of a type IIIA tibial tubercle avulsion fracture.

Figure 3: Postoperative anteroposterior radiograph of the right knee after treatment of a type IIIA tibial tubercle avulsion fracture.

Long-term outcome was assessed with the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and Lysholm knee score. Patients were mailed the SF-36 and replied over a 4-month period. Each patient was then contacted via telephone, and Lysholm knee scores were determined by their responses to all questions on the scale.

The SF-36 is a validated instrument useful for estimating disease burden and comparing disease-specific benchmarks with general population norms, as illustrated in articles describing more than 200 diseases and conditions, including surgical procedures in relationship to ambulation.10 The SF-36 is divided into 8 scales, which form 2 distinct higher-ordered clusters: physical and mental. Three scales (physical functioning, role-physical, and bodily pain) correlate most highly with the Physical Component Summary measure and were especially considered in the data tabulation.11 The reliability of the 8 scales and 2 summary measures has been estimated using both internal consistency and test–retest methods.10 Published reliability statistics have exceeded the minimum standard of 0.70 recommended for measures used in group comparisons in more than 25 studies and usually exceed 0.90.11

The Lysholm knee scale is a validated, condition-specific outcome measure useful for calculating psychometric performance in various disorders of the knee.12,13 Significant correlations have been made between the overall Lysholm knee scale and physical functioning, role-physical, and bodily pain domains of the SF-36.13

Results

Eight patients with 8 tibial tuberosity fractures were observed for this study. Mean age at time of injury was 13.7 years (range, 12 years 9 months to 15 years 6 months). Initial diagnosis was made in the emergency room in 6 of 8 patients, with 2 diagnoses being made in the outpatient clinic setting. All 8 patients were boys, and 5 had right-side injuries and 3 had left-side injuries. The mechanism of injury was the same for all patients in this study: landing from jumping while playing organized basketball. Table 1 details patient data.

Patient Data

Table 1: Patient Data

Initial findings on physical examination included swelling of the anterior proximal tibia, a palpable deformity, mild ecchymosis, and diffuse tenderness. Competency of the extensor mechanism of the knee was tested with a straight leg raise. The diagnosis of an acute tibial tubercle avulsion fracture was confirmed with a lateral radiograph. None of the 8 patients had a previous documented history of Osgood-Schlatter disease or preexisting anterior knee pain. No concomitant injuries were associated with any patient, including patellar or quadriceps avulsions, collateral or cruciate ligament tears, or meniscal damage.

The Ogden modification of the Watson-Jones classification was used to describe each patient’s injury severity (Table 2; Figure 4).4 A type 4 fracture has been proposed by Ryu and Debenham14 in which the tuberosity fracture extends posteriorly along the entire proximal tibial physis. Type 5 fractures have been described by McKoy and Stanitski15 in which a type 3B fracture is combined with a type 4 fracture to create a “Y” configuration. The fracture fragments were displaced in all patients in this study. Four patients had type 2A fractures, which were treated with open reduction and a single screw. Four patients had type 3A fractures, which were treated with a 2-screw technique.

Ogden Classification

Table 2: Ogden Classification

Schematic of the Ogden Classification System.

Figure 4: Schematic of the Ogden Classification System.

All patients were examined in the acute care or outpatient setting over the follow-up period. Minimum postoperative follow-up was 24 months. No complications, such as infection, fracture malunion or non-union, hardware failure, compartment syndrome (pre- or postoperatively), or limb deformity, were observed. Range of motion exercises were started an average of 4 weeks postoperatively. Return to activity was reported an average of 4 months postoperatively, and return to basketball at a pre-injury level was reported by all patients an average of 9 months postoperatively. The rehabilitation protocol was followed strictly by each patient. The protocol allowed each patient to bear weight with no limitation at 4 months, which also included full, unrestricted jumping exercises. Full knee range of motion and quadriceps strength compared with the uninvolved side were restored in all patients at last follow-up. No patient had evidence of growth disturbance of the proximal tibia or recurvatum at final follow-up.

Three patients reported mild joint line tenderness on cast removal during the early follow-up period. This may be attributed to potential meniscal injury stemming from type 3 fractures extending beyond the joint surface. A limited anterior surgical approach was performed in all cases, with fluoroscopy being used to assess reduction of the fracture fragments. The joint surface was not explored during the procedure.

Between November 2010 and February 2011, SF-36 surveys were obtained. Each patient who was contacted replied to the survey; in some instances, several patients had been discharged from the practice due to previously documented full recovery at last follow-up and length of time from initial onset of injury. All patients indicated excellent physical health (Table 3). Their perceptions were further validated by subsequently reviewing each patient’s Lysholm knee score (Table 4).

Short Form 36 Health Survey Patient Response Data

Table 3: Short Form 36 Health Survey Patient Response Data

Lysholm Knee Scale

Table 4: Lysholm Knee Scale

Discussion

Tibial tubercle avulsion fractures are uncommon injuries that usually occur in adolescent male athletes as isolated injuries. They result from pushing off or landing while jumping as the quadriceps eccentrically contract, causing a direct force to be placed at the area of the patellar tendon insertion.1,2,5,6 When the force is greater than the strength of the tibial tubercle physis, a fracture is created. The fracture propagates through the proximal tibial epiphysis and may extend into the anterior portion of the knee joint. Because the proximal tibia physis closes from posterior to anterior, the fracture pattern is dependent on the amount of physeal closure present at the time of injury.1,5,6 Predisposing factors include patella baja, tight hamstrings, preexisting Osgood-Schlatter disease, and disorders involving physeal abnormalities.1–3

Management of tibial tubercle fractures is primarily based on the injury severity and fracture pattern. The Ogden classification is most commonly used to classify and treat these fractures. Type 1A fractures are managed nonoperatively, with immobilization in a long-leg or cylinder cast. Operative fixation has been advocated for types 1B through 5. Many fixation options are available to address these injuries. Open reduction of displaced fragments with fixation by cancellous screws is effective. Percutaneous cannulated screw fixation can be attempted for fracture types that extend to the joint and have minimal displacement.7–9

Fixation with cancellous bone screws achieved bony union in all patients in this study. The authors recommend open reduction and a single screw for type 2 fractures. An additional screw is necessary for type 3 fractures. The senior author’s postoperative course of strict nonweight bearing and a cylinder cast or brace was well tolerated by all patients in this study. Casting is favored over bracing due to potential non-compliance in this adolescent patient population. Guided physical therapy beginning with range of motion exercises at 4 weeks and progression back to full weight bearing over 12 weeks proved successful in all patients and led to a return to sports participation at an average of 9 months.

Treatment modalities continue to be developed for this injury type. Arthroscopic-assisted open fixation has been described.7 Fixation with various combinations of wires, suture repairs, and tension band techniques have been used with good results.8 The outcomes were excellent in the current study, in which simple open reduction and internal fixation techniques with cancellous screws were used. Three patients in this study had mild joint line tenderness during the immediate postoperative period at the time of cast removal. The pain resolved in all patients but could represent a type 3 fracture involving the articular surface and overlying meniscus. The meniscus may also have been trapped between 2 fragments during reduction because the procedure was performed under fluoroscopic guidance rather than direct visualization of the joint. An arthroscopic-assisted procedure may aid reduction in the future, as well as assess any meniscal pathology that may stem from this fracture type. This technique would be most useful in a type 3 fracture. An additional exposure through a small medial parapatellar arthrotomy could also be used if suspicion of meniscal injury was high or articular reduction needed to be confirmed.

All patients in this study were able to return to participation in basketball. The SF-36 results point to no hindrance with activities of daily living. All categories that would confirm physical recuperation were answered negatively by all patients, including limitation of activities, physical health problems, and pain. These results were further confirmed by the excellent Lysholm scores for each patient.

Complications are relatively unusual but can have potentially devastating effects. Recurrent deformity, especially recurvatum of the tibia, has been described.1–7,9 Currently, no specific age cutoffs exist for the development of recurvatum deformity, but considering that the physeal closure in adolescent boys occurs between 15 and 19 years, if an injury were to occur earlier in life, a higher potential would exist for recurvatum deformity. Compartment syndrome in the anterior compartment of the lower leg is also possible.1–7,9,14 Some authors report using prophylactic fasciotomy to avoid this potential complication.7 Percutaneous methods have also been cited as posing an increased risk for compartment syndrome.8 Refracture can occur if strict postoperative rehabilitation protocols are not followed by the patient.1–4,7 Arthrofibrosis of the knee is a potential concern, especially if arthroscopic-assisted techniques are used.7 No instances of compartment syndrome were observed in the current study. Other complications, such as malunion, nonunion, refracture, hardware failure, genu recurvatum, deep venous thrombosis, neuroma formation, limb-length discrepancy, and tibial tubercle pain, were not encountered in this study.

This study used the SF-36, which is a validated general health outcome measurement, and the Lysholm knee scale, which is a joint-specific outcome measurement scale. The SF-36 is validated in English and Spanish, which was a factor in the patient population served by the tertiary medical center in this study. The Lysholm knee scale was initially developed with ligamentous injury in mind but has been validated for other knee procedures and found to be easy to use.13 The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form may be a better choice for future follow-up of this injury type with its ability to assess any condition involving the knee. The form’s main strength is the ability to assess groups with different diagnoses; thus, the current authors decided not to use it because the study had only 1 injury. The Marx scale assesses running, cutting, decelerating, and pivoting, all of which are required for basketball. However, the Marx activity scale does not assess jumping or landing, which were the main injury physiologies found in this study, so it was not chosen for outcome measures. Future assessment of return to play following this injury could include the Marx activity scale.

The major limitation of the study was its retrospective nature. Small sample size was also a limiting factor. Several patients had to be excluded from the study because their treatment occurred before conversion to electronic medical record storage and prior to Picture Archiving and Communication System use at the authors’ institution. Referral bias may also be an issue because all treatment was performed at a tertiary referral center.

Conclusion

Return to play results at the preinjury level were favorable after treatment of acute tibial avulsion fractures in adolescent basketball players. Long-term outcomes were excellent in all patients regardless of fracture type. Open reduction and internal fixation using 1 or 2 cancellous bone screws achieved union in all cases. Arthroscopic-assisted procedures may prove beneficial in addressing meniscal pathology and confirming articular surface reduction in type 3 fractures.

References

  1. Abalo A, Akakpo-numado KG, Dossim A, Walla A, Gnassingbe K, Tekou AH. Avulsion fractures of the tibial tubercle. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2008; 16(3):308–311.
  2. Bolesta MJ, Fitch RD. Tibial tubercle avulsions. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986; 6(2):186–192. doi:10.1097/01241398-198603000-00013 [CrossRef]
  3. Levi JH, Coleman CR. Fracture of the tibial tubercle. Am J Sports Med. 1976; 4(6):254–263. doi:10.1177/036354657600400604 [CrossRef]
  4. Ogden JA, Tross RB, Murphy MJ. Fractures of the tibial tuberosity in adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980; 62(2):205–215.
  5. Chow SP, Lam JJ, Leong JC. Fracture of the tibial tubercle in the adolescent. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72(2):231–234.
  6. Mosier SM, Stanitski CL. Acute tibial tubercle avulsion fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004; 24(2):181–184. doi:10.1097/01241398-200403000-00009 [CrossRef]
  7. Frey S, Hosalkar H, Cameron DB, Heath A, David Horn B, Ganley TJ. Tibial tuberosity fractures in adolescents. J Child Orthop. 2008; 2(6):469–474. doi:10.1007/s11832-008-0131-z [CrossRef]
  8. Pesl T, Havranek P. Acute tibial tubercle avulsion fractures in children: selective use of the closed reduction and internal fixation method. J Child Orthop. 2008; 2(5):353–356. doi:10.1007/s11832-008-0126-9 [CrossRef]
  9. Zrig M, Annabi H, Ammari T, Trabelsi M, Mbarek M, Ben Hassine H. Acute tibial tubercle avulsion fractures in the sporting adolescent. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008; 128(12):1437–1442. doi:10.1007/s00402-008-0628-4 [CrossRef]
  10. Ware JE Jr, . SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24):3130–3139. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008 [CrossRef]
  11. Ware JE, Gandek Bthe IQOLA Project Group. The SF-36 Health Survey: development and use in mental health research and the IQOLA Project. Int J Ment Health. 1994; 23(2):49–73.
  12. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; (198):43–49.
  13. Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee scale and various chondral disorders of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(6):1139–1145.
  14. Ryu RK, Debenham JO. An unusual avulsion fracture of the proximal tibial epiphysis. Case report and proposed addition to the Watson–Jones classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; (194):181–184.
  15. McKoy BE, Stanitski CL. Acute tibial tubercle avulsion fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003; 34(3):397–403. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(02)00061-5 [CrossRef]

Patient Data

Patient No./Sex/Age, y:mo Initial Diagnosis Injured Side Time From Injury to Surgery, d Ogden Fracture Type
1/M/13:8 ER Right 7 3A
2/M/12:12 ER Right 5 3A
3/M/12:9 ER Left 3 2A
4/M/13:3 ER Right 3 3A
5/M/14:4 ER Left 3 2A
6/M/14:0 ER Left 2 2A
7/M/15:6 OC Right 11 2A
8/M/13:6 OC Right 16 3A

Ogden Classification

Type Description
I Fracture of the secondary ossification center the insertion of the patellar tendon
II Fracture propagates to proximal to the junction the primary ossification center
III Fracture extends posteriorly to cross the primary ossification center
Modifier A, nondisplaced; B, displaced

Short Form 36 Health Survey Patient Response Data

In general, would you say your health is: Excellent, 7; very good, 1

Compared with 1 year ago, how would you rate your health in general now: Somewhat better now than 1 year ago, 1; about the same, 7

Limitations of activities

All questions (n510) answered No, not limited at all, 8

 

Physical health problems

All questions (n54) answered No, 8

 

Emotional health problems

Cut down the amount of time you spent on work or other activities: No, 8

Accomplished less than you would like: No, 7; Yes, 1

Did not do work or other activities as carefully as usual: No, 6; Yes, 2

 

Social activities

Emotional problems interfered with your normal social activities with family, friends, neighbors, or groups: Not at all, 6; Slightly, 1; Moderately, 1

 

Pain

How much bodily pain have you had during the past 4 weeks?: None, 8

During the past 4 weeks, how much did pain interfere with your normal work (including work outside the home and housework)?:Not at all, 8

 

Energy and emotions

Did you feel full of pep?: All of the time, 7; most of the time, 1

Have you been a very nervous person?: None of the time, 8

Have you felt so down in the dumps that nothing could cheer you up?: None of the time, 8

Have you felt calm and peaceful?: Some of the time, 5; a good bit of the time, 3

Did you have a lot of energy?: All of the time, 6; most of the time, 2

Have you felt downhearted and blue?: None of the time, 7; a little bit of the time, 1

Did you feel worn out?: None of the time, 8

Have you been a happy person?: Most of the time, 7; all of the time, 1

Did you feel tired?: A little bit of the time, 3; none of the time, 5

 

Social activities

During the past 4 weeks, how much of the time has your physical health or emotional problems interfered with your social activities (visiting your friends, relatives, etc)?: None of the time, 8

 

General health

I seem to get sick a little easier than other people: Don’t know, 4; definitely false, 4

I am as healthy as anybody I know: Definitely, 6; don’t know, 2

I expect my health to get worse: Definitely false, 8

My health is excellent: Definitely, 8

 

Lysholm Knee Scale

Limp (5 points)
  None 5 ___
  Slight or periodic 3 ___
  Severe and constant 0 ___
Support (5 points)
  Full support 5 ___
  Cane or crutch 3 ___
  Weight bearing impossible 0 ___
Stair climbing (5 points)
  No problems 5 ___
  Slightly impaired 3 ___
  One step at a time 2 ___
  Unable 0 ___
Squatting (5 points)
  No problem 5 ___
  Lightly impaired 3 ___
  Not past 90° 2 ___
  Unable 0 ___
    TOTAL ___
Walking, running, and jumping instability (30 points)
  Never giving way 30 ___
  Rarely gives way except for athletic or other severe exertion 25 ___
  Gives way frequently during athletic events or severe exertion 0 ___
  Occasionally in daily activities 10 ___
  Often in daily activities 5 ___
  Every step 0 ___
Swelling (10 points)
  None 10 ___
  With giving way 7 ___
  On severe exertion 5 ___
  On ordinary exertion 2 ___
  Constant 0 ___
Pain (30 points)
  None 30 ___
  Inconstant and slight during severe exertion 25 ___
  Marked on giving way 20 ___
  Marked during severe exertion 15 ___
  Marked on or after walking >1¼ miles 10 ___
  Marked on or after walking <1¼ miles 5 ___
  Constant and severe 0 ___
Atrophy of thigh (5 points)
  None 5 ___
  1–2 cm 3 ___
  >2 cm 0 ___
    TOTAL ___

doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120725-07

Healio is intended for health care provider use and all comments will be posted at the discretion of the editors. We reserve the right not to post any comments with unsolicited information about medical devices or other products. At no time will Healio be used for medical advice to patients.