While cost might be considered, clinicians agree newer agents work best

  • Primary Care Optometry News, September 2010
    Alan G Kabat, OD, FAAO; Jill Autrey, OD, RPh; Julie A Tyler, OD, FAAO; Walter L Choate Jr, OD, FAAO

Recommend the best treatment

Alan G. Kabat, OD, FAAO: Even with pharmaceuticals, you get what you pay for. Newer drugs are typically better and, hence, carry a higher price tag. While some practitioners prefer to use generic medications because they are less costly, older therapies have significant limitations. Patients and practitioners alike need to beware of such “bargains.”

Alan G. Kabat, OD, FAAO
Alan G. Kabat

In bacterial conjunctivitis, I opt for the latest generation fluoroquinolones. My personal preference is moxifloxacin, but I would not fault someone for selecting besifloxacin, which appears to have an equivalent spectrum of activity and similar dosing.

Each of these drugs offers excellent coverage for both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms, as well as minimal ocular toxicity and convenient dosing at three times daily. Compared with older generation fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin) or aminoglycosides (e.g., gentamicin), these newer drugs have far less potential for bacterial resistance and adverse events. If we consider that less than 10% of eye care practitioners routinely culture for bacterial conjunctivitis, it makes sense to select an antibiotic regimen with the greatest potential for success out of the gate.

Of course, we need to be sensitive to our patients’ financial concerns, and we can always elect to prescribe a less costly option if someone simply cannot afford our preferred therapy. But, clearly, cheaper is rarely better.

Our goal should be to recommend the best treatment option for a given disorder, be it pharmaceutical, optical or otherwise. When selecting a medication, we should first consider the global efficacy of that drug within the specific class, then we should evaluate the safety of our choice for a given patient. Cost should be our third consideration.

  • Alan G. Kabat, OD, FAAO, is an associate professor at Nova Southeastern University. He can be reached at (954) 262-1440; kabat@nova.edu.

Consider risk, comorbidity, finances

Julie A. Tyler, OD, FAAO: Before making an antibiotic selection, I will consider a few key areas. Specifically, I will look at associated risk factors, comorbidities and the patient’s financial options. Depending on the severity of the conjunctivitis, these factors will vary in degree of importance.

Julie A. Tyler, OD, FAAO
Julie A. Tyler

For example, if the patient with bacterial conjunctivitis is also a contact lens wearer, I generally will prescribe the newest fluoroquinolone due to the broad-spectrum coverage and decreased risk of resistance. Prescribing a fluoroquinolone is especially important if there are any signs of secondary corneal infiltration.

In contrast, if the patient has a comorbidity of significant lid or ocular surface disease, I would consider using azithromycin 1%, which has the benefits of a broad-spectrum topical antibiotic with anti-inflammatory properties, in addition to a limited dosing regimen for conjunctivitis. All of those qualities have proven beneficial for patients with accompanying lid disease. Moreover, when the patient also has severe lid disease, I will recommend azithromycin for longer than the 5-day conjunctivitis regimen.

Unfortunately, many of my patients are uninsured or have limited financial resources. In such cases I will use the “tried and true” antibiotics such as Polytrim (polymyxin B-trimethoprim, Allergan) or medications available in generic form such as tobramycin.

Finally, individuals with an intact immune system can likely fight off most bacterial conjunctivitis without medication in a week to 10 days. In cases where the conjunctivitis is not severe and finances are a concern, I sometimes give the patient the option to use only supportive therapy but to call if the symptoms or vision worsens.

  • Julie A. Tyler, OD, FAAO, is an associate professor and Primary Care Module chief at Nova Southeastern University College of Optometry. She can be reached at jtyler@nova.edu.

Use broad-spectrum treatment

Jill Autry, OD, RPh: I must preface my answer by saying I believe many conjunctivitis cases are misdiagnosed as bacterial when they are actually viral. This leads to overuse of antibiotics by all practitioners. Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated this fact, and even “culture positive” cases are probably normal ocular flora contaminants. I also see this clinically when, practicing in a referral center, I examine patients being treated for bacterial conjunctivitis that is actually viral and in desperate need of anti-inflammatory treatment, not antibacterial.

Jill Autry, OD, RPh
Jill Autry

However, in true bacterial conjunctivitis, studies show that, although most cases will resolve without therapy, treating the condition will lessen the severity and length of symptomatology. Depending on the study cited, gram-positive organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae are more common (60% to 70% of cases) than gram-negative organisms such as Haemophilus influenza (30% to 40% of cases). This illustrates our need for broad-spectrum coverage.

I would treat most patients with a newer-generation fluoroquinolone. These agents are well known for their tolerability, lack of allergic reactions, broad-spectrum coverage, ability to cover resistant organisms and compliance-friendly (twice to four times daily) dosing.

Although some of the latest class additions may offer theoretic advantages due to increased concentration (Zymaxid, gatifloxacin 0.5%, Allergan) and lack of oral equivalency (Besivance, besifloxacin 0.6%, Bausch + Lomb), all newer-generation products will work well.

I would use tobramycin, an aminoglycoside, if the patient lacked insurance coverage and did not need extended treatment due to concerns of corneal and conjunctival toxicity. I would use polysporin if an ointment was necessary in a child younger than 1 year of age or in any case where drops could not be used. After 24 to 48 hours, I would add a topical steroid providing there was a decrease in the purulent nature of the discharge. After all, the word conjunctivitis still means inflammation of the conjunctiva.

  • Jill Autry, OD, RPh, a Primary Care Optometry News Editorial Board member, is a partner at Eye Center of Texas in Houston. She can be reached at (713) 797-1010; jill_autry@hotmail.com.

Newer drugs work more quickly

Walter L. Choate Jr., OD, FAAO: Bacterial conjunctivitis is not frequently encountered in most optometry practices, largely because primary care physicians and pediatricians typically treat it. However when we see these patients, it is usually for a second opinion.

Walter L. Choate Jr., OD, FAAO
Walter L. Choate Jr.

Regarding whether to start a patient on a latest-generation drop for acute bacterial conjunctivitis, it is important to note that the disease itself is self-limited and will improve in a week or two with no treatment. It is also important that most patients never make it into the chair of an eye physician for treatment. As such, in almost all of those cases, this disease is treated successfully with first- and second-generation topical antibiotics.

Most optometric physicians will probably reach for a combination of tobramycin and dexamethasone or tobramycin and loteprednol, both of which contain a second-generation antibiotic. With the addition of a steroid, inflammation will be improved substantially. Most, if not all, patients with bacterial conjunctivitis improve dramatically with these drugs.

The literature indicates that very little bacterial resistance results from the use of topical antibiotics. Therefore, one would conclude that the use of the latest-generation antibiotic should be appropriate, especially in severe cases.

However in real-world practice, we see price as the defining barrier. Indeed, if all of the newest-generation antibiotics were the same cost as earlier-generation products, perhaps all new prescriptions would be issued with the latest products. After 30 years of patient experience with a wide spectrum of antibiotics, I can say that most work very well – even the old ones, but we as clinicians will always be charged with making the patient better quickly. The newest antibiotics offer many benefits in efficacy and comfort.

  • Walter L. Choate Jr., OD, FAAO, is a member of the Primary Care Optometry News Editorial Board. He can be reached at (615) 851-7575; walterchoate@aol.com.

Comments

Healio is intended for health care provider use and all comments will be posted at the discretion of the editors. We reserve the right not to post any comments with unsolicited information about medical devices or other products. At no time will Healio be used for medical advice to patients.

[X]