Barriers can affect patient–clinician communication about palliative care

  • HemOnc Today, March 25, 2012

I have been consulted on multiple occasions to evaluate terminally ill patients for depression and denial of their advanced disease.

In many of these instances, I encountered communication gaps between the patient and the medical staff.

Most patients are not familiar with medical terminology and do not know how to navigate the medical system. They see their oncologist in the outpatient clinic, but when they get hospitalized, they are seen by the covering medical team at the hospital. When that happens, patients often feel like foreigners. They hope to see their regular outpatient oncologist and have difficulty understanding why their regular doctor cannot see them.

Fill in the gaps

I’ve seen residents struggle trying to fill in communication gaps. An orientation with minimal use of technical language could decrease a patient’s level of distress.

Patients must be guided and told about the responsibilities of the treating medical team. For example, residents could explain their role, as well as their relationship with the outpatient oncologist.

The effort to inform a patient that someone at the hospital is helping to coordinate their care could minimize their concerns and help to set more realistic expectations.

Preservation of dignity

It can be difficult for patients to reveal their thoughts and feelings in a place that may make them uncomfortable. Clinicians can facilitate the creation of an environment in which patients feel safer to share their emotions.

Clinicians should strive to earn their patients’ trust by preserving the dignity of patients and their families. Allowing a patient to tell his or her life story can go a long way toward doing that, helping them feel like more than just a body with a cancer.

Maria Rueda-Lara, MD
Maria Rueda-Lara

Harvey M. Chochinov, MD, and colleagues developed a treatment called dignity therapy that allows patients to tell their life stories and pass them on as a legacy to their loved ones. This practice helps patients and their families to preserve dignity and prepare for death.

William Breitbart, MD, and colleagues developed meaning-centered group psychotherapy, designed to help patients with advanced cancer enhance their sense of meaning, peace, purpose, hope and spiritual well-being, even as they are confronted with death. The approach demonstrated reductions in patients’ anxiety and their desire for hastened death.

Clinicians also can preserve their patients’ dignity by treating them with respect and using good manners. These efforts include practices such as knocking on the door and asking permission to interrupt a patient’s meal before speaking with them.

Assess patients’ understanding

Assessing patients’ understanding of their disease helps to determine whether they are ready and willing to have an end-of life discussion.

A study by Ramirez, Graham, Richards and colleagues found that 10% to 30% of patients with terminal and recurrent cancer were not aware of or had difficulties admitting the seriousness of their disease.

Finding out what patients know can help determine whether they can tolerate an end-of-life conversation. If a patient is in denial, the clinician could ask the patient to give a history of what has happened since his or her cancer diagnosis and assess to what extent the patient is able to cope with it.

The clinician then should ask the patient if he or she knows what is wrong, then point out any inconsistencies between the patient’s perceptions and what actually is happening. If the patient is ambivalent or reluctant to talk about it, the clinician could ask the patient about the reason for the ambivalence or the conflict.

How to deliver bad news

If clinicians must deliver bad news — even if appropriate conditions for doing so are met — it is important that they pause and give patients the opportunity to comprehend what is communicated. The clinician then could acknowledge the patient’s likely fears, saying something like, “I can imagine how difficult this is for you.”

This statement could indicate to patients that it is OK to talk about their feelings, and they may use it as an opportunity to tell clinicians why they are distressed and mention something that could be done to help them.

Other behaviors can impair good communication between clinicians and patients.

They include:

  • Giving advice or reassurance before the patient has the opportunity to express their concerns prevents them from disclosing what is causing them to be distressed.
  • Assuming the source of a patient’s stress. For example, some patients could be more worried about their children than the dying process.
  • Not giving patients time to process what they have been told. It is not uncommon to unintentionally change the topic during a conversation, preventing the patient from fully processing what was said. This may deprive patients from being able to express or address the issue that is causing them distress.

Improved communication

Good communication is essential when treating patients. With good communication, patients can make more informed consent choices.

Fallowfield and colleagues found that patients who received inadequate information — either too much or too little — are at higher risk of developing psychiatric illness such as depression or generalized anxiety disorder.

Good communication also affects the loved ones who must prepare for the patient’s eventual death. Research has shown family members who were not prepared for the loss of a relative are more likely to suffer from complicated grief or depression.

Workshops have been developed to help clinicians improve their communication skills.

A valuable online resource is the Oncotalk program, sponsored by the NCI. It can be found at http://depts.washington.edu/oncotalk.

Topics include fundamental communication skills, delivering bad news, managing the transition to palliative care, talking about advance care plans, conducting family conferences and how clinicians should handle requests for therapies that they believe are futile.

Maria Rueda-Lara, MD, is an assistant professor of clinical psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center and the University of Miami’s Miller School of Medicine.

Disclosure: Dr. Rueda-Lara reports no relevant financial disclosures.

For more information:

  • Breitbart W. Psychooncology. 2010;19:21-28.
  • Chochinov HM. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5520-5525.
  • Fallowfield L. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1445-1449.
  • Ramirez AJ. Lancet. 1996;347:724-728.

Comments

Healio is intended for health care provider use and all comments will be posted at the discretion of the editors. We reserve the right not to post any comments with unsolicited information about medical devices or other products. At no time will Healio be used for medical advice to patients.

[X]