Two studies examined hepatitis B screening and positivity in cancer patients.
ASCO
2010 Annual Meeting
The prevalence of hepatitis B screening to prevent a flare in disease in
patients initiating chemotherapy is suboptimal and still misses patients at
high risk for hepatitis B reactivation, according to data from two
single-institution studies presented at the 2010 ASCO Annual Meeting.
Screening for hepatitis B can prevent virus reactivation, which is a
well-recognized complication that occurs after chemotherapy. More than 5% of
cancer patients who have hepatitis B reactivation die from liver failure,
according to Emmy Ludwig, MD, assistant attending physician at Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. In addition, risk for reactivation persists for
at least 6 months after immunosuppression ends, and prophylaxis to prevent
reactivation is effective and easily administered, Ludwig said.
Despite still suboptimal screening rates, “hepatitis B screening is gaining momentum in oncology and
public health communities,” said Jessica P. Hwang, MD, MPH,
assistant professor, department of general internal medicine at The University
of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.
In 2008, the CDC issued a recommendation that called for routine
screening for hepatitis B in all patients undergoing cytotoxic or
immunosuppressive therapy. Earlier this year,
ASCO
published a provisional clinical opinion to address hepatitis B screening
in cancer patients. Its recommendations differed slightly from the CDC’s.
“ASCO advised physicians to screen patients who are either at high
risk for hepatitis B or who are planning to have therapies that are highly
immunosuppressive, such as hematologic stem cell transplantation or regimens
containing rituximab [Rituxan, Genentech],” Hwang said.
Despite these recommendations, widespread compliance has been slow to
gain traction, and more research is needed to better define the benefits of
more routine screening policies.
Screening by cancer type
The first study examining hepatitis B screening was conducted by Hwang
and colleagues at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. The retrospective,
cross-sectional study examined newly diagnosed adult cancer patients who had
undergone chemotherapy between January 2004 and September 2007. The researchers
defined the proportion of these patients who had undergone screening for the
hepatitis B virus using hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis B core
antigen (anti-HBc) 2 months before or 1 month after their first chemotherapy
(n=12,340).
Analyses were conducted to examine differences in the prevalence of
screening and test positivity between solid and hematologic malignances.
Of the patients who had undergone chemotherapy, 18% had been screened
with HBsAg (2% positive) and 17% had been screened with anti-HBc (8% positive).
“Rates of screening were significantly lower for patients with
solid tumors as compared with patients with hematologic malignancies,”
Hwang said. “However, despite the lower rates of screening, the solid
tumor patients who were screened had significantly higher rates of positive
test results.”
The researchers also conducted a subgroup analysis to examine the rate
of hepatitis B screening among patients at high risk for the virus by looking
at ICD-9 diagnosis codes in billing databases before the date of the first
screening test, Hwang said. Further, they looked at tumor registry data to
examine ethnic groups that may be at increased risk for hepatitis B.
“Overall, patients with hepatitis C, general hepatitis and other
liver disease had a significantly increased rate of screening than patients who
did not have these diagnoses,” Hwang said.
However, when examining the Asian population — used as a surrogate
for coming from a high prevalence area — the rates of screening were low
and did not significantly differ by ethnicity. Yet, as anticipated, Asian
patients had significantly higher rates of having a positive HBsAg (26% vs. 1%
in non-Asians).
These same prevalence trends were found when examining solid tumor
patients.
In contrast, in hematologic malignancy patients, screening did not
significantly differ by known hepatitis B risk factors. In hematologic
malignancy patients, rates of screening and positive HBsAg were also higher
among Asians as compared with non-Asians, according to Hwang.
In all, about 20% of patients undergoing chemotherapy were previously
screened for hepatitis B virus.
“Although patients with liver-related risk factors had higher rates
of screening, the rates were still suboptimal,” Hwang said.
Immunosuppressive therapy
In the second study, Ludwig and colleagues at Memorial Sloan-Kettering
Cancer Center reported the results of a study that examined the prevalence of
HBsAg and hepatitis B virus core antibody (HBcAb) positivity in the first 6
months of a hepatitis B screening program in patients initiating
immunosuppressive therapy.
The researchers had previously identified 22 patients who had hepatitis
B virus reactivation. Four patients died, 19 were hospitalized, one required a
liver transplant and four had clinically significant delays in their cancer
treatment or surgery. No association was identified linking the reactivation
with a particular malignancy or medication. Therefore, Memorial Sloan-Kettering
Cancer Center established a standard to screen patients initiating
immunosuppressive therapy for hepatitis B. The recommendation for prophylaxis
of patients was based on planned treatment and risk group.
During the first 6 months of the program, 3,343 patients (48%) were
screened for hepatitis B before first chemotherapy intervention; 4.8% were
tested after first chemotherapy intervention and 43.6% were not tested. In all,
1,720 patients were screened. If patients were positive for HBsAg or HBcAb,
hepatitis B DNA by polymerase chain reaction (HBV PCR) was measured.
Of the screened patients, 1.1% were positive for HBsAg (83.3% of whom had evidence of positive HBV
PCR) and 9.2% were HBsAg negative but HBcAb positive (2.6% of these patients were HBV
PCR positive; see Table).
“Of real concern are the four patients who were HBsAg negative but
HBcAb positive — who had evidence of HBV replication,” Ludwig said
“This group is thought to be large; in some studies, up to 20% of patients
with HBcAb who lack HBsAb still replicate virus.”
In addition, the researchers found that “profiling” by country
of birth, cancer diagnosis or planned treatment missed a substantial number of
patients.
Finally, in this program, prophylactic treatment with a nucleoside
antiviral agent was 100% effective in preventing HBV reactivation, Ludwig said.
Moving forward, although additional research is needed on the optimal
timing, duration and type of antiviral prophylaxis, the ultimate goal is zero
reactivation cases, she added. – by Leah Lawrence
Table: Serology Profile Results Among
Hepatitis B Virus Screened Patients (n=1,720) |
| |
Asian Birth |
Solid Tumor |
HBV PCR+ |
HBsAg+ 18/1,720 (1.1%) |
46% |
91% |
15 (83.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HBsAg – HBcAb+ 155/1,720 (9.2%) |
19% |
76% |
4 (2.6%) |
Source: Ludwig E. #9009.
|


There are unclear benefits and harms to routine screening for hepatitis
B in patients undergoing cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy. Current
practice should be guided by awareness and clinical judgment. More research is
necessary to determine prevalence rates, risk factors for reactivation and
strategies for prophylactic treatment.
– Sandra Wong, MD
Assistant Professor,
Division of Surgical Oncology,
University of Michigan Health Systems
For more information:
More Meeting
Highlights>>
Follow HemOncToday.com
on Twitter.